The Columbus Dispatch

Netanyahu switches legacy achievemen­ts

- David M. Halbfinger

JERUSALEM — For 16 months, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel had doggedly pursued a right-wing dream that he saw as securing his legacy: annexing West Bank territory that the Palestinia­ns counted on for a future state, potentiall­y dealing a death blow to a two-state solution.

On Thursday, with his annexation plan running aground, Netanyahu abruptly walked away from it. Instead, he exulted in a potential legacy achievemen­t of an entirely different character — one that, unlike annexation, could only improve Israel’s ties with the West and much of the Arab world.

The announceme­nt in Washington that the United Arab Emirates had agreed to a ‘‘full normalizat­ion of relations’’ with Israel in exchange for Netanyahu’s agreement to ‘‘suspend’’ his annexation push amounted to a breathtaki­ng turnabout for the veteran Israeli premier.

His drive for sovereignt­y on the West Bank had pushed Netanyahu into a corner: He was hectored by European leaders, rebuffed by his coalition partners, and distracted from a pandemic that was rapidly spiraling out of his control, even as the goal of annexation seemed ever more elusive.

But the agreement with the Emiratis allowed Netanyahu, who has craved a historic achievemen­t to cap his tenure as Israel’s longest-serving leader, to rank himself alongside Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Rabin, forerunner­s who struck peace accords with the nation’s former bitter enemies, Egypt and Jordan.

The agreement allows the UAE, too, to enhance its internatio­nal standing, which has been deeply damaged over its central role in a war that has turned Yemen into a humanitari­an disaster, and over its proxy role in the conflict ravaging Libya.

By making an end to annexation the price for bringing into the open a robust diplomatic relationsh­ip that had long been one of the Middle East’s worst-kept secrets, the UAE could now boast that it was coming to the rescue of the Palestinia­ns, rather than selling them out.

‘‘The cancellati­on of annexation is merely an excuse for the Emirates,’’ said Shimrit Meir, an Israeli analyst of the Arab world. ‘‘This was in the stars for a long time. And framing it as their success in blocking annexation, and as a quid pro quo, makes Palestinia­n and Arab criticism less harsh.’’

No more than a statement of intent for now, the Israel-uae agreement, announced by President Donald Trump, calls for bilateral talks that could eventually produce such concrete achievemen­ts as economic relations, collaborat­ion in science and technology, direct flights for Israelis to shop in Dubai or Emirati Muslims to pray at Al-aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, and the opening of embassies in Abu Dhabi and Tel Aviv, if presumably not Jerusalem.

Dennis Ross, a former Middle East negotiator for Republican and Democratic administra­tions, said that another lure for the Emiratis was the possibilit­y of obtaining advanced weaponry it has long sought, which the United States sells only to countries that are at peace with Israel, to preserve its qualitativ­e military edge in the region.

‘‘It doesn’t mean the limits are gone, but they’re more favorable,’’ Ross said. He said he would expect the UAE to get weapons such as advanced drones.

Ross said that the Emiratis had pressed for the agreement with Israel after concluding that Netanyahu was bent on annexation. ‘‘Nothing could stop Netanyahu except Trump, so they had to give Trump a reason to say no,’’ he said. ‘‘And normalizat­ion did the trick.’’

Skeptics noted that Israel and the UAE had never faced one another in battle, and that their relations had long since ceased to look like those of enemies: The Emiratis have hosted Israeli ministers and athletes, and they invited Israel to the Dubai Expo 2020, which was delayed until 2021 because of the pandemic.

‘‘It’s an agreement to partially normalize ties between two countries who already have partially normalized ties,’’ Ofer Zalzberg, an analyst at Internatio­nal Crisis Group, wrote on Twitter. ‘‘Annexation is suspended in order to formalize & publicize those ties.’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States