The Columbus Dispatch

The CDC’S bad coronaviru­s testing advice

-

Last week was a bad one for the credibilit­y of federal health officials, who have backtracke­d under fire from two ill-considered pandemic directives that were adopted under pressure from the White House.

It started Aug. 23 with the head of the Food and Drug Administra­tion, Dr. Stephen Hahn, grossly overstatin­g the benefits of giving COVID-19 patients blood plasma from people who’d recovered from the coronaviru­s. To support President Donald Trump’s announceme­nt that the therapy was some sort of amazing breakthrou­gh (it isn’t) and that the FDA would be giving it emergency approval, Hahn had said the treatment would save an additional 35 lives out of 100 patients treated. Other medical experts quickly pointed out, however, that the data showed no such thing, and on Aug. 25 Hahn publicly apologized.

The following day it was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s turn for embarrassm­ent. A few days earlier the CDC had quietly updated its coronaviru­s testing guidelines to discourage people who have been exposed to the virus from getting tested, a move roundly criticized by scientists, doctors and virtually every U.S. public health expert in the country.

In the ensuing uproar, it was revealed that the recommenda­tion to do less testing came from the politicos on the White House’s coronaviru­s task force, not the experts at CDC. Trump has been vocal about wanting to slow down testing because he illogicall­y concludes that the right way to fight the infection is to pretend it isn’t there. The new guidelines appeared to be in keeping with his wishes.

But it’s not in keeping with science or what health officials have been recommendi­ng for months as necessary to control the spread of the virus. That’s because, according to the CDC itself, as many as 40% of the people who have COVID-19 don’t have symptoms but can still infect others. Someone who has been in close contact for more than 15 minutes with an infected person should be considered infected too until tested, and it’s astonishin­gly irresponsi­ble for the CDC to suggest otherwise.

CDC head Dr. Robert Redfield “clarified” the revision on Thursday. He said that maybe people who come into contact should get tested if they want one or if their doctor or state officials recommend one.

Americans are confused enough by all the misinforma­tion and mixed messaging about the coronaviru­s that’s been emanating from the federal government since the outbreak began. This surely won’t help.

The CDC should be pushing to do more testing — much, much more — because the informatio­n the test results provide about where and how the virus is spreading is crucial to safely reopening hard-hit industries, resuming church services and letting students go back to classrooms.

Testing is the way public health officials identify virus hot spots, trace infections and figure out what activities are putting people at most risk.

Happily, California and other states are ignoring the CDC’S incredibly bad advice on testing. Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday announced a new $1.4-billion initiative to increase coronaviru­s testing in the state by 150%, from 100,000 a day to 250,000 — and to do it cheaper and get results quicker. This is going to be all the more important when the flu season kicks in this fall and the demand for tests increases.

These are not the first black eyes the CDC or the FDA has received under the Trump administra­tion; remember when the CDC reversed itself on whether it was safe to reopen schools under pressure from the president? But for the sake of all of us, they need to be the last ones.

Los Angeles Times

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States