The Columbus Dispatch

Lawsuit cites problems in background check system

- Rick Rouan

Columbus and Dayton are suing Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost’s office over what they say is a failure to update the criminal background check system used to investigat­e potential gun owners.

In a lawsuit filed Monday in Franklin County Common Pleas Court, the cities argue that the attorney general’s office is responsibl­e to “procure” informatio­n about any person convicted of a felony “from wherever procurable” and to add that informatio­n to a state database, which feeds into a federal background check system.

They cite reports that indicate that isn’t happening. In one, Ohio Auditor Keith Faber notes that in more than half of Ohio’s 88 counties at least one court or law enforcemen­t department didn’t report records on time or, in some cases, at all, according to the lawsuit. A 2018 report from former Gov. John Kasich’s administra­tion found that many clerks of courts around Ohio reported not sending complete criminal conviction informatio­n to the Bureau of Criminal Investigat­ion and Identification (BCI).

The cities believe Yost’s office is obligated to seek that informatio­n out to ensure the state database has complete informatio­n. Not doing so has amounted to a “continuing and dangerous failure,” they wrote in the lawsuit.

“We want to make sure that our residents and visitors are safe,” Columbus Mayor Andrew J. Ginther said. “The only way to do that is to have a background check system that correctly identifies all individual­s who have been convicted of certain offenses. The protection and safety of every Ohioan requires nothing less.”

Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley, City At

torney Zach Klein and other officials joined Ginther to discuss the lawsuit at a news conference Monday, with all of them citing BCI’S mismanagem­ent of the state’s background check system.

The lawsuit asks the judge to find “BCI in default of its obligation­s” and direct the office “to promptly fulfill their mandatory, nondiscret­ionary legal obligation­s to procure disqualify­ing criminal history and other relevant informatio­n pertaining to all persons convicted of relevant crimes.”

“Ohio officials have a clear obligation to make sure felony criminal conviction­s and all other required records are part of the state and fed background check systems. Despite years of investigat­ions, reporting and task forces, public record makes clear there are still massive gaps that have gone unaddresse­d for far too long,” said Eric Tirschwell, managing director of Everytown Law, a national organizati­on representi­ng the cities in the litigation.

In response to the lawsuit, BCI spokesman Bethany Mccorkle said the complaint is embedded in “high drama, low substance and no solutions.”

“The best evidence of that is how we learned of it … through a press conference,” Mccorkle said in an email. “The utter lack of communicat­ion smacks of bad faith and is a poor mechanism to fix any problem.

“We are investing millions of dollars to improve this system, and have taken steps to root out any errors. BCI is working with the court system and law enforcemen­t agencies to ensure informatio­n is more quickly and accurately fed into the background check system as required. We cannot force them to provide the informatio­n. BCI is working toward having a process that is faster and the informatio­n is accurately verified. The problemati­c link in this chain is not BCI, as the complaint notes.”

Ohio’s past two governors have pressed for improvemen­ts to the background check system, but the Ohio General Assembly has not passed legislatio­n to fix loopholes they have encountere­d. After Kasich pointed out gaps in the system in 2018, Gov. Mike Dewine proposed his own fixes in 2019 after the mass shooting in Dayton’s Oregon District. Dewine tasked Innovateoh­io with developing a data portal for 1,300 local agencies to file warrants and protection orders, with that informatio­n being shared across state databases that gun dealers use when selling a firearm.

Dewine asked state lawmakers to require local agencies to report to that system, but his gun reforms have gotten little traction in the General Assembly.

Tirschwell said the lawsuit will push BCI to make the necessary steps to improve public safety across the state. For these steps to be made, he said all parties will need to properly identify the system’s issues.

“There are a range of potential solutions, but the first things that have to happen are to really scope out the full range of the problem and to confirm that BCI has this obligation,” he said.

Whaley said the two cities are well aware the lawsuit won’t immediatel­y stop gun violence, but the system’s approval is needed to ensure public safety is justly prioritize­d.

“We won’t be able to stop shootings in Ohio overnight,” Whaley said, “but at the bare minimum, when a problem is as clear as this one and there are straightfo­rward solutions, our constituen­ts deserve action.”

“We will all be safer the day these problems are fixed.”

Dispatch Reporter Earl Hopkins contribute­d to this story.

rrouan@dispatch.com@rickrouane hopkins@dispatch.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States