The Columbus Dispatch

Let more light in to disinfect Ohio legislatin­g

-

Most people have heard the old saw that legislatin­g is like making sausage – even though it can result in something marvelous, the process can be distastefu­l. But what if the sausage makes everyone sick? If no one saw the sausage being made, how do customers know who didn’t wash theirs hands and who added the moldy cuts and which sausage chefs absolutely should be fired?

Thanks to a 20-year-old outrage by the General Assembly, Ohioans find themselves choking on a lot of mystery meat.

In 1999, lawmakers exempted documents of the Legislativ­e Service Commission – the bipartisan body that researches and drafts the bills legislator­s want to turn into law – from Ohio’s open-records law. That meant Ohioans no longer could find out for themselves that a bill carried and supposedly crafted with care by Lawmaker X actually was written in its entirety by lobbyists – special interests like, say, the National Rifle Associatio­n or Planned Parenthood. You know, the folks whose campaign contributi­ons help keep politician­s in office.

A bit less than two years later, legislator­s sealed off the light completely, with a law blocking access to LSC documents even by courts or investigat­ors.

The potential for legislativ­e poisoning was obvious from the start.

House Bill 6, the now-infamous 2019 measure that authorized a $1.3 billion bailout of two nuclear power plants courtesy of Ohio electricit­y ratepayers, is the rankest bit of legislativ­e butchery in recent memory.

We know this because an informant went to law enforcemen­t authoritie­s and an ongoing investigat­ion by the FBI has laid out a convincing case that the bill was bought and paid for with $60 million from the benefiting company, in a fund alleged to be illegally controlled by former House Speaker Larry Householde­r, R-glenford.

A number of the bill’s advocates owed their House seats in large part to campaign contributi­ons from Firstenerg­y Corp., parent company of the entity that owned the power plants.

Firstenerg­y’s overwhelmi­ng monetary influence was always suspected, but might have been provable sooner if the Ohio General Assembly hadn’t acted nearly two decades ago to hide the sausagemak­ing from view.

More important, if everyone could see what goes into every batch of sausage, Ohioans probably would have sent a lot of other rotten bills straight down the garbage disposal.

With the HB 6 debacle fresh in everyone’s minds, Dispatch Public Affairs Editor Darrel Rowland asked lawmakers who were up for election this year what they thought about keeping LSC documents secret. Happily, most say all correspond­ence should be public, at least as soon as a bill is introduced.

One bureaucrat disagreed, emailing Rowland that voters should judge bills by their content and not by the reputation of the lobby group that proposes or writes them.

That would be fine, if every voter were a policy profession­al, well versed in scanning pages of legalese for the important stuff. Most voters are not, and their level of savvy is no match for the obfuscatio­n and spin a skilled lobbying group can give a pending bill.

But knowing that, say, a fossil-fuels lobbyist wrote that bill with the green-sounding title would be an excellent tip-off that the bill needs a closer look. Not to mention what it reveals about the sponsoring lawmaker’s political alliances.

If the General Assembly wants to rehabilita­te its reputation, it should repeal HB 6 – and then let the light back into the sausage kitchen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States