The Columbus Dispatch

GOP leaders in 4 states quash president’s bid on electors

- Bob Christie and Nicholas Riccardi

Republican leaders in four crucial states won by President-elect Joe Biden said they won’t try to flip their state’s electors to vote for President Donald Trump. Their comments effectively shut down a plot some Republican­s floated as a last chance to keep Trump in the White House.

State GOP lawmakers in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvan­ia and Wisconsin have said they would not intervene in the selection of electors, who ultimately cast the votes that secure a candidate’s victory. Such a move would violate state law and a vote of the people, several noted.

“I do not see, short of finding some type of fraud ... I don’t see us in any serious way addressing a change in electors,” said Rusty Bowers, Arizona’s Republican House speaker, who said he has been inundated with emails pleading for the legislatur­e to intervene. “They are mandated by statute to choose according to the vote of the people.”

The idea loosely involves Gop-controlled legislatur­es dismissing Biden’s popular vote victories in their states and opting to select Trump electors. Although the endgame was unknown, it appeared to hinge on the expectatio­n that a conservati­ve-leaning Supreme Court would settle any dispute over the move.

Still, it has been promoted by Trump allies, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and is an example of misleading informatio­n and false claims fueling skepticism among Trump supporters about the integrity of the vote.

Republican­s also suffered setbacks to court challenges over the presidenti­al election in three battlegrou­nd states on Friday.

In Pennsylvan­ia, a federal appeals court rejected an effort to block about 9,300 mail-in ballots that arrived after Election Day. The judges noted the “vast disruption” and “unpreceden­ted challenges” facing the nation during the COVID-19 pandemic as they upheld the three-day extension.

In Michigan, where Biden leads by

more than 140,000 votes, a judge refused to stop the certification of Detroit-area election results, rejecting claims the city had committed fraud and tainted the count with its handling of absentee ballots. And in Arizona, a judge dismissed a Trump campaign lawsuit seeking the inspection of ballots in metro Phoenix after the campaign’s attorneys acknowledg­ed the small number of ballots at issue wouldn’t change the outcome.

The electors theory is rooted in the fact that the U.S. Constituti­on grants state legislatur­es the power to decide how electors are chosen. Each state has passed laws that delegate this power to voters and appoint electors for whichever candidate wins the state on Election Day. The only opportunit­y for a state legislatur­e to then get involved with electors is a provision in federal law allowing it if the actual election “fails.”

If the result of the election was unnknown in mid-december, at the deadline for naming electors, Republican-controlled legislatur­es in those states could declare that Trump won and appoint electors supporting him. .

The problem, legal experts noted, is that the result of the election is not in any way unknown. Biden won all the states at issue. It’s hard to argue the election “failed” when Trump’s Department of Homeland Security reported it was not tampered with and was “the most secure in American history.” There has been no finding of widespread fraud.

 ?? JOHN LOCHER/AP ?? Supporters of President Donald Trump protest the election outside of the Clark County Election Department in North Las Vegas.
JOHN LOCHER/AP Supporters of President Donald Trump protest the election outside of the Clark County Election Department in North Las Vegas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States