The Columbus Dispatch

Moderna follows Pfizer, seeks FDA consent for vaccine

- Karen Weintraub

Biotech company Moderna was to apply Monday for an emergency use authorizat­ion from the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion after receiving more good news about the safety and effectiveness of its candidate COVID-19 vaccine.

Moderna is the second vaccine maker to request authorizat­ion from the federal government after similarly positive results for Pfizer and its German collaborat­or Biontech’s candidate vaccine.

Moderna said its latest findings showed that of 196 people in the clinical trial who caught COVID-19, 185 had received the placebo, while only 11 received the active vaccine. That’s an effectiveness rate above 94%.

Of the 30 participan­ts who suffered severe disease, all were in the placebo group, which suggests the vaccine prevents mild and serious disease. One

placebo recipient died.

Effectiveness was consistent across age groups, race and ethnicity. The 196 participan­ts with cases of COVID-19 included 33 adults over 65 and 42 who identified as Hispanic, Black, Asian American or multiracia­l.

The Moderna vaccine, called MRNA-1273, also has been shown to be safe, with no new safety concerns identified. It caused side effects in the majority of recipients, usually fever and aches lasting a day or two.

Moderna said it expects the FDA’S advisory committee to discuss MRNA-1273 on Dec. 17, a week after it meets to discuss Pfizer’s vaccine, and authorizat­ion is expected to come a few days after each meeting.

“These results are stunning,” said Dr. Robert Wachter, chairman of the department of medicine at the University of California-san Francisco, adding that he is particular­ly impressed by the vaccine’s success in preventing serious disease. “This is a remarkably effective vaccine and, with results like that, a game-changer.”

Moncef Slaoui, who co-leads the government’s Operation Warp Speed, which has overseen the developmen­t of Moderna’s vaccine and helped finance production of Pfizer’s, also is impressed with the results and the novel MRNA technology behind both.

“I think the Moderna data continue to support how exceptiona­lly effective MRNA vaccines are,” he said. He also touted the effectiveness against severe disease, “and also 87% protection in subjects above the age of 65, the most impacted group in our population.”

Dr. Peter Hotez, a pediatrici­an and co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Developmen­t, called the news “really impressive, with the caveat that it’s a company press release.”

Hotez said the vaccine provided so much protection against serious illness that it may be unethical to continue allowing participan­ts in other clinical trials to receive a placebo.

Dr. Stephen Hoge, Moderna president, emphasized the success of his company’s vaccine and how quickly scientists were able to develop it.

“Everything on this has gone faster than expected,” he said. “The data is truly exciting.”

Hoge said the company filed for FDA authorizat­ion now, he said, because “there’s nothing more we would do. ... We passed the baton.”

The trial has been the same size and scope as with any vaccine. The only reason the company is requesting an emergency authorizat­ion instead of full FDA approval is because no one wants to wait a year or two to see how long the vaccine remains protective. Long-term effectiveness will be determined later, and people will receive booster shots if needed. “These vaccines have developed tremendous amounts of data,” Hoge said. “The Phase 3 ones – ourselves and Pfizer – have been conducted to the gold standard. Hopefully, people have confidence” in them.

The pressure is now on, Hoge said, to produce the promised number of vaccine doses: 20 million in the next month and at least 80 million more next year for the U.S. The company started producing vaccine at its plant and will ramp up production in the next month with help from contract manufactur­er Lonza Biologics.

To win FDA authorizat­ion, companies have to show three things: their vaccine is safe, it’s more than 50% effective, and it can be produced reliably and safely.

Moderna, whose vaccine was developed in collaborat­ion with government scientists, and Pfizer/biontech met the requiremen­ts.

To prove safety, the companies had wait until two months after half of their trial participan­ts had received the candidate vaccine.

A bad reaction to a vaccine is likely to occur within six weeks of vaccinatio­n. Both companies reached that mark without seeing any major or life-threatenin­g problems among trial participan­ts.

Most volunteers suffered temporary side effects, including muscle aches, headaches and fatigue for a day or two after vaccinatio­n. Side effects were generally worse after the second dose of the two-dose regimen.

Pfizer/biontech showed earlier this month that its candidate vaccine, BNT162B2, was 95% effective and submitted a request for FDA authorizat­ion Nov. 20.

Moderna released interim effectiveness results this month showing equal effectiveness: Of 95 trial participan­ts diagnosed with COVID-19, 90 had received a placebo.

There was concern this fall that the companies or the government would try to shorten vaccine developmen­t by relying on interim effectiveness results. But because so many people are contractin­g COVID-19, it took only a little more than a week for an additional 95 people in Moderna’s trial to catch the virus.

Vaccine makers determine effectiveness by comparing the number of trial participan­ts who come down with the disease at least two weeks after the second dose of either the vaccine or the placebo.

Statistica­lly, once more than about 150 illnesses have been recorded, the effectiven­ess seen in those cases is likely to hold true for the larger population.

 ?? JOE RAEDLE/GETTY IMAGES ?? Moderna reported a 95.4% effectiven­ess rate for its COVID-19 vaccine in an interim analysis earlier this month.
JOE RAEDLE/GETTY IMAGES Moderna reported a 95.4% effectiven­ess rate for its COVID-19 vaccine in an interim analysis earlier this month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States