The Columbus Dispatch

Administra­tion urges abortion law block

- Paul J. Weber

AUSTIN, Texas – The Biden administra­tion on Friday urged a federal judge to block the nation’s most restrictiv­e abortion law, which has banned most procedures in Texas since early September and sent women racing to get care beyond the borders of the second-most populous state.

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, did not say when he would rule following a nearly three-hour hearing in Austin. At least one Texas abortion provider said it stood ready to resume offering services if the law known as Senate Bill 8 is temporaril­y shelved.

“Every day that S.B. 8 is in effect, we turn away patients in droves,” Amy Hagstrom Miller, president of Whole Woman’s Health, told the court in a filing.

So far, abortion providers trying to block the Texas law have been rejected at every turn. That makes a lawsuit filed by the Biden administra­tion their best chance yet to deliver the first legal blow to the Gop-engineered law. It has withstood an early wave of challenges, including one reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which allowed the law to remain in force.

The law effectively bans abortion before some women know they are pregnant, and there are no exceptions in cases of rape or incest. Enforcemen­t is solely left up to private citizens, who are entitled to at least $10,000 in damages if they are successful in suing not just abortion providers but anyone found to have helped a woman get an abortion.

“A state may not ban abortions at six weeks. Texas knew this, but it wanted a six-week ban anyway, so the state resorted to an unpreceden­ted scheme of vigilante justice that was designed to scare abortion providers and others who might help women exercise their constituti­onal rights,” Justice Department attorney Brian Netter told the court.

The law was signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in May and took effect Sept. 1.

In that short time, abortion providers say, “exactly what we feared” has become reality. They have described Texas clinics that are now in danger of closing while neighborin­g states struggle to keep up with a surge of patients who must drive hundreds of miles from Texas. Other women, they say, are being forced to carry pregnancie­s to term.

“This is not some kind of vigilante scheme,” said Will Thompson, defending the law for the Texas Attorney General’s Office. “This is a scheme that uses the normal, lawful process of justice in Texas.”

If the Justice Department prevails, Texas officials would likely seek a swift reversal from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which previously allowed the restrictio­ns to take effect.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court begins a new term, which in December will include arguments in Mississipp­i’s bid to have the landmark Roe v. Wade decision guaranteei­ng a woman’s right to an abortion overturned.

Last month, the court did not rule on the constituti­onality of the Texas law in allowing it to remain in place. But abortion providers took that 5-4 vote as an ominous sign about where the court might be heading on abortion after its conservati­ve majority was fortified with three appointees of former President Donald Trump.

 ?? JAY JANNER/ AUSTIN AMERICANST­ATESMAN ?? A federal judge will consider whether Texas can leave in place the most restrictiv­e abortion law in the U.S.
JAY JANNER/ AUSTIN AMERICANST­ATESMAN A federal judge will consider whether Texas can leave in place the most restrictiv­e abortion law in the U.S.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States