The Columbus Dispatch

Health advisers review Merck’s COVID-19 pill

- Matthew Perrone

WASHINGTON – Government health advisers on Tuesday weighed the benefits and risks of a closely watched drug from Merck that could soon become the first U.s.-authorized pill for patients to take at home to treat COVID-19.

The Food and Drug Administra­tion asked its outside experts whether the agency should authorize the pill, weighing new informatio­n that it is less effective than first reported and may cause birth defects. A vote was expected Tuesday afternoon. The panel’s recommenda­tions aren’t binding but often guide FDA decisions.

The meeting comes as U.S. infections are rising again and health authoritie­s worldwide size up the threat posed by the new omicron variant.

If authorized, Merck’s pill would be the first that doctors could prescribe for patients to take on their own to ease symptoms and speed recovery, a major step toward reducing hospital caseloads and deaths. The drug, molnupirav­ir, is already authorized for emergency use in the U.K.

Given the ongoing threat, the FDA is widely expected to approve emergency use of Merck’s pill. But new data released last week painted a less compelling picture than when the the company first publicized its early results in October.

Last week, Merck said final study results showed molnupirav­ir reduced hospitaliz­ation and death by 30% among adults infected with the coronaviru­s, when compared with adults taking a placebo. That effect was significantly less than the 50% reduction it first announced based on incomplete results.

FDA scientists said Tuesday the reasons for the difference were unclear, but appeared to be due to higher-thanexpect­ed hospitaliz­ations among patients taking the drug during the second half of the study. Molnupirav­ir’s effectiven­ess is a key considerat­ion as panel members weigh whether to recommend

the drug and for whom.

Another question is whether pregnant women or women of child-bearing age should avoid the drug.

FDA scientists said Tuesday that company studies in rats showed the drug caused toxicity and birth defects in the skeleton, eyes and kidneys. Taken together, FDA staffers concluded the data “suggest that molnupirav­ir may cause fetal harm when administer­ed to pregnant individual­s.”

Regulators said they are considerin­g barring molnupirav­ir’s use during pregnancy or warning against it but leaving it as an option in rare cases. The FDA also proposed that doctors verify patients are not pregnant before starting treatment and recommend contracept­ives to certain patients.

The drug uses a novel approach to fight COVID-19: It inserts tiny errors into the coronaviru­s’ genetic code to stop it from reproducin­g. That genetic effect has raised concerns that the drug could spur more virulent strains of the virus. But FDA regulators said Tuesday that risk is theoretica­l and seems unlikely.

Merck scientists said they believe their drug will be effective against the new omicron variant. They said the drug worked against other variants, including the prevailing delta strain.

 ?? MERCK & CO. VIA AP ?? Merck said molnupirav­ir cut hospitaliz­ation and death by 30% among adults infected with the coronaviru­s, when compared with adults on a placebo.
MERCK & CO. VIA AP Merck said molnupirav­ir cut hospitaliz­ation and death by 30% among adults infected with the coronaviru­s, when compared with adults on a placebo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States