The Columbus Dispatch

Congress OKS latest $40B for Ukraine

Bipartisan-approved aid will fund weapons, food

- Alan Fram

WASHINGTON – The Senate overwhelmi­ngly approved a $40 billion infusion of military and economic aid for Ukraine and its allies on Thursday as both parties rallied behind America’s latest, and quite possibly not last, financial salvo against Russia’s invasion.

The 86-11 vote gave final congressio­nal approval to the package, three weeks after President Joe Biden requested a smaller $33 billion version and after a lone Republican opponent delayed Senate passage for a week. Every voting Democrat and all but 11 Republican­s – including many of the chamber’s supporters of former President Donald Trump’s isolationi­st agenda – backed the measure.

“I applaud the Congress for sending a clear bipartisan message to the world that the people of the United States stand together with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend their democracy and freedom,” Biden said in a written statement afterward.

Biden’s quick signature was certain as Russia’s attack, which has mauled Ukraine’s forces and cities, slogs into a fourth month with no obvious end ahead. That means more casualties and destructio­n in Ukraine, which has relied heavily on U.S. and Western assistance for its survival, especially advanced arms, with requests for more aid potentiall­y looming.

“Help is on the way, really significan­t help. Help that could make sure that the Ukrainians are victorious,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., underscori­ng a goal that seemed nearly unthinkabl­e when Russia launched its brutal assault in February.

Final passage came as Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the U.S. had authorized shipping Ukraine another $100 million worth of weapons and equipment from Pentagon stocks. That brought the total U.S. materiel sent to Kyiv since the invasion began to $3.9 billion, exhausting the amounts Congress previously made available but that will be replenishe­d by the newest legislatio­n.

The vote was a glaring exception to the partisan divisions that have hindered work on other issues under Biden and that promise to become only less bridgeable as November’s elections for control of Congress draw closer. That includes Republican­s blocking Democrats from including billions to combat the pandemic in the measure, leaving their efforts to battle COVID-19 in limbo.

Last week the House approved the Ukraine bill 368-57, with all of those opposed Republican­s. Though support in both chambers was unmistakab­ly bipartisan, the GOP defections were noteworthy after Trump, still a potent force in the party, complained that such sums should first be targeted at domestic problems.

Schumer called it “beyond troubling” that Republican­s were opposing the Ukraine assistance. “It appears more and more that MAGA Republican­s are on the same soft-on-putin playbook that we saw used by former President Trump,” said Schumer, using the Make America Great Again acronym Democrats have been using to cast those Republican­s as extremists.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch Mcconnell, R-KY., a strong backer of the measure, addressed concerns by his GOP colleagues. He said Ukraine’s defeat would jeopardize America’s European trading partners, increase U.S. security costs there and embolden autocrats in China and elsewhere to grab territory in their regions.

“The most expensive and painful thing America could possibly do in the long run would be to stop investing in sovereignt­y, stability and deterrence before it’s too late,” Mcconnell said.

On Wednesday, Schumer said he was not confident this would be the final measure to help Ukraine. “They’re doing the fighting, they’re the ones getting killed, they’re the ones struggling and suffering. The least we can do is give them the weaponry they need,” he said.

The legislatio­n contains around $24 billion for weapons, equipment and military financing for Ukraine, restoring Pentagon stocks of arms sent to the region and paying for U.S. reinforcem­ents sent there. The rest includes economic aid to keep Zelenskyy’s government functionin­g, food programs for countries that rely on Ukraine’s diminished crop production, refugee assistance and funds for Kyiv to investigat­e Russian war crimes.

Congress approved an initial $13.6 billion measure in March. The combined price tag of nearly $54 billion exceeds what the U.S. spent on all its foreign and military aid in 2019, according to the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Research Service.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-KY., who’s long had non-interventi­onist views, used procedural tactics last week to thwart Schumer and Mcconnell from moving the measure through the Senate then, citing Ukraine’s urgent need for the assistance.

The Ukraine spending concerned some Trump-friendly Republican­s in Congress on Wednesday.

“It’s, you know, the world’s going to end if you don’t do anything here,” Sen. Mike Braun, R-ind., who said he would oppose the Ukraine measure. “I’m more worried about the trust fund going broke” that finances Medicare and another that pays for Social Security.

Braun said he’s long pushed for bills that pay for themselves. Asked why saving $40 billion in this instance outweighed stopping Russia, he said, “Number one, it’s going to pass.”

Another conservati­ve, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-texas, said that as costly as the measure is, the aid will protect U.S. national security and said, “If Putin wins, the consequenc­es for America and American taxpayers will be hundreds of billions of dollars.”

“The most expensive ... thing America could possibly do in the long run would be to stop investing in sovereignt­y, stability and deterrence before it’s too late.” Mitch Mcconnell, R-KY. Senate minority leader

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Ukrainians are “doing the fighting, they’re the ones getting killed, they’re the ones struggling and suffering. The least we can do is give them the weaponry they need.”
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Ukrainians are “doing the fighting, they’re the ones getting killed, they’re the ones struggling and suffering. The least we can do is give them the weaponry they need.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States