The Columbus Dispatch

Can working from home be a danger to your mental health?

- Your Turn Gleb Tsipursky Guest columnist

While flexibilit­y in work arrangemen­ts has been praised for allowing employees to avoid long commutes and manage work-life balance more effectivel­y, skeptics argue that such arrangemen­ts lead to increased feelings of isolation and blurred work-life boundaries.

Groundbrea­king research conducted by University of Pittsburgh Professor Mark Ma and his graduate student Yuye Ding provides actual data-based insights on whether flexibilit­y is actually good or bad for mental health.

According to a 2022 U.S. Chamber of Commerce survey of 403 executives, 64% of executives said that remote work had anywhere from a major to a minor negative impact on their employees’ mental health, up from 55% saying that in 2021.

And a survey by the American Psychiatri­c Associatio­n in 2021 found that the majority of employees working from home say they experience­d negative mental health impacts, including isolation, loneliness, and difficulty getting away from work at the end of the day.

However, as the University of Pittsburgh scholars point out, such research stems from the period of enforced social isolation due to the pandemic.

It’s very likely that the loneliness and isolation identified previously with remote work decreased - or in some cases, completely disappeare­d — once people started going out and meeting with friends and family, and engaging in various social, civic, and community activities.

Moreover, prior studies relied on survey data of self-reported mental health, as opposed to mental health risk measured based on profession­al assessment­s.

The University of Pittsburgh study instead drew on state-level depression and suicide risk data from Mental

Health America, which collects data from over 5 million mental health screens taken by US users at Mhascreeni­ng.org.

The University of Pittsburgh scholars also used data on the percentage of firms that offer workplace flexibilit­y in each state during 2023 from the Scoop Flex Index Report.

Combining these two sources, the new study from the University of Pittsburgh reveals significan­t findings for 2023, the first year we can truly say the pandemic was largely over: states with a higher percentage of flexible firms show considerab­ly lower rates of depression. The correlatio­n is robust, with depression rates in states with a higher degree of flexibilit­y showing a negative correlatio­n coefficien­t to depression of -0.389 and a p-value of 0.012, suggesting a strong inverse relationsh­ip. In other words, this data compelling­ly argues that having greater flexibilit­y strongly facilitate­s mental wellness.

They also separated states into three groups, ones with high, median, or low levels of flexibilit­y, respective­ly. They found that states with high or median flexibilit­y levels had 3-4% lower depression rates than those with low flexibilit­y in 2023.

While the study establishe­s a clear correlatio­n, it’s important to explore the possible mechanisms through which workplace flexibilit­y improves mental health. One possibilit­y is reduced stress, since flexible work arrangemen­ts help alleviate stress associated with commuting, rigid schedules, and work-life imbalance. This allows employees to better manage their time, responsibi­lities, and personal needs, leading to reduced stress levels and improved mental well-being.

Another positive factor for well-being involves increased autonomy and control. This autonomy fosters feelings of ownership and responsibi­lity, leading to increased job satisfacti­on and reduced stress. The ability to adjust work schedules and locations allows employees to better integrate their profession­al and personal lives, facilitati­ng work-life balance.

Gleb Tsipursky serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultanc­y Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored “Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States