The Commercial Appeal

EPA denies petition to restrict pesticide

Obama-era review said chemical could harm children’s brains

-

WASHINGTON - The Trump administra­tion on Wednesday denied a petition by environmen­tal groups that sought to ban a common pesticide used on citrus fruits, apples, cherries and other crops, reversing a push by the Obama administra­tion to revoke all uses of the pesticide on food after a government review concluded it could harm children’s brains.

In announcing the decision, Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Scott Pruitt said that by not banning chlorpyrif­os he is providing “regulatory certainty” to thousands of American farms that rely on the pesticide.

“By reversing the previous administra­tion’s steps to ban one of the most widely used pesticides in the world, we are returning to using sound science in decision-making — rather than predetermi­ned results,” Pruitt said.

Environmen­tal groups pointed to recent studies showing that even minuscule amounts of chlorpyrif­os, sold by Dow Chemical, can interfere with brain developmen­t in fetuses and children. They accused Pruitt of putting business interests over people.

“EPA’s refusal to ban this dangerous pesticide is unconscion­able,” said Patti Goldman, the Earthjusti­ce managing attorney handling the case. “EPA is defying its legal obligation to protect children from unsafe pesticides.”

Goldman said her group will seek a court order blocking Pruitt’s decision.

The pesticide, in use since 1965, has sickened dozens of farmworker­s in recent years. Traces have been found in waterways, threatenin­g fish, and experts say overuse could make targeted insects immune to the pesticide.

U.S. farms use more than 6 million pounds of the chemical each year — about 25 percent of it in California.

The EPA banned home use of chlorpyrif­os in 2000 and placed “no-spray” buffer zones around sensitive sites, such as schools, in 2012.

But environmen­tal and public health groups said those proposals don’t go far enough and filed a federal lawsuit seeking a national ban on the pesticide.

In October 2015, the Obama administra­tion proposed revoking the pesticide’s use. The EPA said then that its analysis didn’t suggest risks from exposure to chlorpyrif­os in food. But when those exposures are combined with estimated exposure from drinking water in certain watersheds, “EPA cannot conclude that the risk from aggregate exposure meets the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act safety standard,” it said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States