The Commercial Appeal

New bill derails juvenile justice reform

- Your Turn Dean Hill Rivkin and Brenda McGee Guest columnists

By all objective measures, Tennessee’s juvenile justice system is in crisis.

After two years of intensive study by bipartisan juvenile justice reform task forces created by the Tennessee Legislatur­e, an alarming picture of the state’s system of treatment and rehabilita­tion for court-involved children and youth emerged.

The juvenile system incarcerat­es, at sizable cost, far too many children for committing minor offenses and keeps children in state custody too long. It entertains far too many cases that would be better handled by schools and social service agencies.

It tethers children to a system of probation when there is no evidence that this practice does any good for the majority of those mired in the system. It fails to use proven best practices for ensuring better outcomes. It fails to provide meaningful due process protection­s.

Compoundin­g these problems, the constituti­onal right to appointed counsel for juveniles is systematic­ally denied, as documented by the Tennessee Supreme Court’s own 2017 Indigent Representa­tion Task Force.

The Juvenile Justice Reform Act (Senate Bill 2261/House Bill 2271) was introduced this term. Sen. Majority Leader Mark Norris (R-Colliervil­le), who understand­s the issues well, led the initiative. Gov. Bill Haslam made it part of his legislativ­e agenda.

This comprehens­ive legislatio­n was designed to correct many of the longstandi­ng injustices and inefficien­cies in the current system. If enacted as introduced, the recommenda­tions could save the state $36 million, improve public safety, and produce a fairer juvenile system, one that is less marred by stark geographic and racial disparitie­s.

Unfortunat­ely, and with no public notice, input, or hearings, this salutary process was derailed by the very groups that are responsibl­e for creating the current dysfunctio­nal system: the state’s juvenile judges and district attorneys.

Led by the Tennessee Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, the Haslam administra­tion introduced an amendment that gutted the original bill.

Under this version, the bill increases

opportunit­ies for courts to jail children and to place them in state custody in noncrimina­l status/unruly cases (truancy, running away, etc.). It expands the offenses for which children and youth can be incarcerat­ed (”widening the net”).

It makes only cosmetic changes to the current system of probation and continues the inappropri­ate lengths of time that children remain court-involved.

It enhances judicial discretion – contrary to venerable rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court that apply nationwide – in a system where unchecked discretion is the norm, thus assuring that “justice by geography,” as Norris has termed it, will persist.

It fails to grapple with the issues of the right to and quality of juvenile counsel and due process that infect the existing system.

It ignores best practices that have worked in other states to change juvenile systems for the better.

At this late stage in the legislativ­e process, several of the original provisions of SB 2261 could be restored. Eliminatin­g the Valid Court Order (VCO), which allows judges indefinite­ly to incarcerat­e status offenders who have committed noncrimina­l offenses, would be a step forward.

Over 4,000 youth are placed under this draconian measure every year. They overwhelmi­ngly do not have an attorney. Only six juvenile courts (including Shelby) account for 80 percent of the VCOs. The VCO has also been condemned by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges and the U.S. Senate and House of Representa­tives.

Another important change would be to correct the violation in the bill that allows a juvenile to be incarcerat­ed in detention facilities longer than the federally-mandated 48 hours before a detention hearing is held. As the facts show, keeping youth out of jail and in school saves the state and counties real money.

Meaningful juvenile justice reform is long overdue in Tennessee. The original bill was widely supported across our state’s political and religious spectrum. The amended bill should fail, and the legislatio­n that was initially introduced should be restored.

Dean Hill Rivkin was a member of the 2016-17 Juvenile Justice Realignmen­t Task Force. Brenda McGee is a children’s rights attorney in Knoxville.

 ?? APPEAL ?? Juvenile Court Judge Dan Michaels listens to speakers during the Breaking the Cycle of Delinquenc­y Symposium A Discussion of the Juvenile Assessment Center Concept for Memphis and Shelby County in October 2017 at the University of Memphis. MARK WEBER / THE COMMERCIAL
APPEAL Juvenile Court Judge Dan Michaels listens to speakers during the Breaking the Cycle of Delinquenc­y Symposium A Discussion of the Juvenile Assessment Center Concept for Memphis and Shelby County in October 2017 at the University of Memphis. MARK WEBER / THE COMMERCIAL

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States