The Commercial Appeal

‘Zombie’ nuclear plant a bad deal, Memphis

- Your Turn Guest columnist

The infamous “zombie” Bellefonte nuclear reactors near Scottsboro, Ala., were cancelled in 2016 by TVA after being mothballed for many decades (and cannibaliz­ed for parts used at other reactors). Billions of dollars were spent and wasted.

The project remains a very, very bad economic bet despite recent efforts by Franklin L. Haney’s Nuclear Developmen­t, LLC, to lure Memphis Gas, Light and Water into buying power from it.

The Bellefonte site has a fascinatin­gly long, complicate­d history that serves as the poster child for all that often goes wrong with nuclear power constructi­on projects.

That can be summed up in one word: failure. And failures aren’t worth repeating, especially multi-billion dollar failures with serious outstandin­g safety concerns that have already cost utility customers too much for literally no electricit­y ever produced.

Why is MLGW being courted? It’s important to remember that Mr. Haney has been trying to revive the Bellefonte project for years.

Our analysis then showed that the Bellefonte privatizat­ion scheme was simplistic­ally constructe­d, contained numerous factual errors, and offered unrealisti­c promises on rates and timeline.

In 2016, Haney won a bid to acquire the abandoned plant from TVA for $112 million -- pennies on the dollar. Now, Nuclear Developmen­t is trying to get more than $8 billion in controvers­ial taxpayer-backed federal nuclear loan guarantees for the project.

There is a November 2018 deadline by which they need to show the Department of Energy that they may have a customer to one day purchase the electricit­y (that likely will never be generated).

Thus, the courtship of MLGW. Haney and his friends are promising massive cost savings to MLGW.

We’re encouraged that MLGW is reviewing all of its options and agree that it shouldn’t rush that review. However, there are a lot of reasons Bellefonte shouldn’t even be on MLGW’s short list. (I won’t focus now on the serious safety concerns about reviving a cannibaliz­ed, abandoned nuclear plant.)

First, MLGW should look to the current fate of JEA, another municipal utility down in Jacksonvil­le, Fla., that wants out of their contractua­l obligation­s with the only remaining new nuclear power constructi­on project in the U.S. -- Southern Company’s Plant Vogtle in Georgia.

Years ago when rosy projection­s were offered about the costs of new nuclear power, JEA bought in to the Vogtle expansion. JEA offered to buy a significan­t portion of power from MEAG, one of the Vogtle co-owners.

Years later, with the original price tag of $14 billion having doubled, and after a 5-year schedule delay, JEA is using every legal and political maneuver to extricate themselves from the bad deal they agreed to.

Second, MLGW should take a hard look at the supposed savings Nuclear Developmen­t, LLC, claims it will receive for buying power from Bellefonte. Question the cost and the schedule for completion by 2023. In what universe? If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Third, and most importantl­y, MLGW should look to actual affordable opportunit­ies that are available today that could save their customers money. In fact, JEA adopted this approach in its dispute with MEAG. In a Sept. 18 letter, JEA leaders assert that, “Costs for both solar and storage have dropped significan­tly over recent years and prices are expected to continue to drop, a fact that is in stark contrast to the megawatt price that will result from the (nuclear) project.”

MLGW, similarly, could access costeffect­ive solar powr to meet customer expectatio­ns for clean, safe, reliable electricit­y. Project developers from within the Tennessee Valley can offer solar to MLGW at prices lower than the wholesale price TVA charges. They are doing deals like this in surroundin­g states like Georgia.

That is the kind of new-energy contract MLGW should be pursuing, rather than a high-risk bet on the cannibaliz­ed, “Zombie” Bellefonte reactors.

Sara Barczak is a regional advocacy director at Southern Alliance for Clean Energy and has been tracking nuclear energy for 15 years.

 ?? Sara Barczak ??
Sara Barczak

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States