The Commercial Appeal

Do VA hospitals here compare to private care?

- Memphis Commercial Appeal USA TODAY NETWORK - TENNESSEE

The average wait time at the Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in Memphis is 7.3 hours between arrival and admission – among the 10 percent worst wait times in the country.

The hospital is one of 82 VA medical centers nationwide where emergency room waits for veterans are longer than for patients at private-sector facilities on average, a USA TODAY analysis of hundreds of pages of individual VA hospital reports found.

At roughly 70 percent of VA hospitals, the median time between arrival and admission was longer than at other hospitals, in some cases by hours, according to the USA TODAY analysis. That included Memphis, where the median wait is 7.3 hours.

The USA TODAY analysis provides the most comprehens­ive picture to date of how 146 VA medical centers compare to other health care facilities on an array of factors. The analysis is based on scores of spreadshee­ts the VA has posted online in recent years containing comparison­s of its medical centers to non-va averages on everything from the ER wait times to infection rates and patient-survey results.

The national median between arrival and admission in 4.3 hours.

Here’s how other VA hospitals in Tennessee compare:

❚ Nashville VA: 4.7 average wait time

❚ Murfreesbo­ro VA: 4.7 average wait time

❚ Daily $2.00

Mountain Home VA: 4.1 average wait time

The analysis produced some positive findings for the VA. As of June 30, a majority of VA hospitals reported lower death and complicati­on rates than other facilities. Many VA medical centers also stacked up better on prevention of post-surgical complicati­ons such as blood clots.

At the same time, dozens had higher rates of preventabl­e infections and severe bed sores – a sign of potential neglect. And nearly every VA performed worse than other medical providers on industry-standard patient satisfacti­on surveys.

VA spokesman Curt Cashour said certain veterans may have conditions that make them more susceptibl­e to complicati­ons and “caution should be exercised” when drawing conclusion­s from the comparison­s.

He said the VA “does recognize the need to improve the speed by which it can admit veterans to the inpatient unit,” but he said non-va hospitals also struggle with long waits.

“VA provides some of the highest quality health care available today,” Cashour said.

The Department of Veterans Affairs has been buffeted by crises since 2014 when news reports revealed that patients died awaiting appointmen­ts at the Phoenix VA hospital. There were lethal lapses in Oklahoma City, patient safety failures in Memphis, and equipment shortages in Washington D.C.

The USA TODAY analysis adds to evidence of uneven quality within the VA system, with some hospitals such those in Asheville, North Carolina, and Sioux Falls, South Dakota, excelling on a wide range of measures while others, such as Memphis, lagged.

The analysis comes as the Trump administra­tion is considerin­g sweeping new rules to widen veterans’ access to outside health care paid for by the VA. It would deliver on a campaign promise made by President Donald Trump to expand health care choices for veterans.

Critics have warned that increasing Va-funded private health care would drain money from the department and lead to its privatizat­ion.

As the administra­tion weighs the standards under which expanded nonva options would be allowed, it is considerin­g variables such as wait times, distance, and – for the first time – quality.

Quality VA care? Where do you live?

The VA began publishing online an array of spreadshee­ts it dubbed “scorecards” in the months after Trump took office. The quarterly assessment­s include comparison­s on 65 measures.

USA TODAY compiled and analyzed the scorecards from June 30, the most recent available, and found that death rates after heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia were the same or lower than non-va averages at two thirds of VA medical centers.

Most VA hospitals also had lower rates than other facilities for a majority of post-surgical complicati­ons such as hemorrhage­s, clots and death.

But nearly 50 VA hospitals had higher rates on at least three of four avoidable infections, such as potentiall­y life-threatenin­g intestinal bacteria and bloodstrea­m infections. More than half had higher rates of severe bedsores.

At some facilities, problems happened far more frequently than at other hospitals – VA or non-va.

Cashour said some key quality measures are not risk-adjusted, and so could appear inflated. He said certain veterans, such as those with spinal cord injuries, are at “much higher risk” of developing bedsores.

While some hospital quality specialist­s said adjusting rates for risk factors is typical in the industry, others say such steps are unnecessar­y for preventabl­e infections and post-surgical complicati­ons.

The VA has tried for years to spread best practices from higher-performing hospitals to more troubled ones. In 2015, the agency launched a “diffusion of excellence” program to replicate successful programs across the country, including direct scheduling of eye and ear appointmen­ts and text messaging of appointmen­t reminders.

In 2017, the VA set up a tracking system at headquarte­rs to identify problem facilities and dispatched teams to help them improve.

Yet as of October, five VA hospitals ranked the lowest one star out of five for the third straight year in agency ratings, including Loma Linda, California, and Phoenix, the site of the 2014 wait-time scandal. The others were Memphis and the VA hospitals in Big Spring and El Paso, Texas.

VA spokesman Cashour said those hospitals have undergone “intensive improvemen­t initiative­s over the past year” and each has “achieved significan­t gains in multiple areas.”

Veteran (dis)satisfacti­on revealed

On patient satisfacti­on surveys, veterans overall were less likely than non-va patients to feel medical workers treated them with respect or listened to and respected what they had to say, the USA TODAY analysis found.

They were also less likely to recommend VA hospitals to others and rated their medical care providers lower.

The VA scorecards analyzed by USA TODAY feature questions for inpatients and outpatient­s about their health care experience­s. Nearly every VA facility – 141 out of 146 – scored below other facilities on a majority of questions surveyed.

In Memphis, veterans rated the VA lower than the medians of patients at other health care providers on 27 of 30 survey questions – the most of any VA facility.

Mary Alimenti, whose husband receives care at the Memphis VA – some 100 miles from their home in Lexington, Tennessee – said hospital staff have been “really mean” when she accompanie­d him to appointmen­ts and “don’t listen.”

“They don’t take the time that they need to with the vets” she told USA TODAY. “It’s like, you know, you’ve got a line of cows, and they’re coming in and going right back out again.”

Cashour said the outpatient survey results are not adjusted for factors like age that could influence the outcomes. He said older patients on average give higher ratings than younger patients for the same care, and sicker patients give lower ratings than healthy ones.

Cashour said the VA does take age and health into account when calculatin­g the results for inpatient surveys. And he said results about whether veterans would recommend VA hospitals are unreliable.

“Veterans often will respond to the survey by telling us they rated the hospital highly but answered this question ‘no’ because their friends and family are not eligible for VA care,” he said.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? This is the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Memphis. YALONDA M. JAMES/THE COMMERCIAL APPEAL
This is the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Memphis. YALONDA M. JAMES/THE COMMERCIAL APPEAL
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States