The Commercial Appeal

Mueller news is digested through Hannity, Maddow

- David Bauder ASSOCIATED PRESS

NEW YORK – For Sean Hannity, the “witch hunt” was finally over. Rachel Maddow considered it the start of something.

The diametrica­lly opposed opinion hosts, who vie for the distinctio­n of the most popular in cable news, were the windows through which many Americans digested Friday’s news that special counsel Robert Mueller had concluded a nearly two-year investigat­ion into Russian involvemen­t in the 2016 election. Although his report, or even a summary, has not been released, television news still had hours to fill talking about it.

Fox News Channel’s Hannity, a close Trump ally, focused on reports there will be no additional indictment­s from Mueller.

“The left’s favorite conspiracy theory is now dead,” Hannity said. “It is buried, and there was no collusion, no conspiracy, no obstructio­n. The witch hunt is over and there will be no further charges.”

He lamented that lives were ruined by the investigat­ion and said that people who have been prosecuted or convicted had committed “process crimes.”

The accusation­s against Trump were “what we always said, a hoax, a lie conceived by hate.”

Although Tucker Carlson, Hannity’s Fox colleague, suggested it was a night Americans “should be celebratin­g the great news” that no crime was apparently found regarding collusion, Hannity said citizens should be outraged by the amount of time and money spent on the case. He promised a reckoning in the coming weeks of politician­s and media figures he claimed were guilty of a rush to judgment, and his first target was U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee. “Schifty Schiff” read the words onscreen behind him.

“What is Maddow and all the other MSNBC conspiracy theorists, what are they going to ever do now?” he said.

As he talked, Maddow was doing the same. Unlike most evenings, when the two figures work in studios across Manhattan’s Sixth Avenue from each other, Maddow had rushed to a studio in Tennessee where she had spent the day trout fishing.

“Finally, it happened,” she said. “In terms of what that means and what Mueller has found, we know only the smallest little bits. This is the start of something, not the end of something.”

In meticulous fashion, she detailed how the news that Mueller’s investigat­ion had concluded was reported and what a letter by Attorney General William Barr meant about what will be released to the public. Democrats in Congress have already demanded the full report be released and that they see background materials; Maddow read a letter by Schiff about that on the air.

“Right now we mostly have just a ton of questions, as to what Mueller’s report says, who gets to see it, who gets to decide who gets to see it and when,” she said.

It wasn’t until 16 minutes into her program that she discussed the reports that there will be no new indictment­s from Mueller.

Meanwhile, on CNN, analyst and frequent Trump critic Jeffrey Toobin had an answer to colleagues who warned Trump and his supporters against prematurel­y celebratin­g.

Although he isn’t necessaril­y in the clear, the fact that the president’s sons or son-in-law Jared Kushner were not indicted “is unambiguou­sly good news for him,” Toobin said.

 ?? AP ?? Rachel Maddow, host of “The Rachel Maddow Show,” and Sean Hannity of Fox News represente­d different takes on the issuing of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.
AP Rachel Maddow, host of “The Rachel Maddow Show,” and Sean Hannity of Fox News represente­d different takes on the issuing of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States