The Community Connection

UPTFC, township continue feud

Chief expelled; commission­er removed from committee

- By Evan Brandt ebrandt@21st-centurymed­ia.com @PottstownN­ews on Twitter

UPPER POTTSGROVE » The increasing friction between the Upper Pottsgrove Board of Commission­ers and the Upper Pottsgrove Township Fire Company is taking its toll.

The fire chief has been “expelled,” membership is down by 70 percent since January and on Aug. 20, the board voted 3-2 to remove Commission­er Martin Schreiber from the fire committee.

Schreiber and Commission­er Elwood Taylor voted no, with Commission­ers’ President Trace Slinkerd, Vice President France Krazalkovi­ch and Commission­er Renee Spaide voting yes.

The fire committee, which has members of the fire company and the board of commission­ers, acts as a communicat­ions link between the two groups.

Slinkerd made the motion to remove Schreiber with no more warning than, as Taylor described it, “four words on the agenda — consider fire commit-

tee organizati­on.”

“I have no document in front of me. If there is an issue, I’d like to see it flushed out. I would like to see some data in front of me,” Taylor said.

Taylor said the board had not discussed the matter in advance — as is Slinkerd’s stated preference before voting.

But Krazalkovi­ch and Slinkerd both said the matter was discussed at the May 21 meeting.

The minutes of that meeting indicate that Krazalkovi­ch made a motion, seconded by Spaide, “to draft a letter of no confidence in the current operationa­l leadership of the fire company.”

That motion was ultimately withdrawn, but at the same meeting, Slinkerd said Schreiber “has various roles and (Slinkerd) believes he cannot be objective when it comes to making decisions regarding the fire company,” according to the minutes.

The May 21 meeting was also where the commission­ers voted unanimousl­y to ask the state to undertake a study of the township’s fire services at no cost to the township.

After Slinkerd made his motion, Schreiber asked him why he was “in a rush” to remove him and did not wait for the fire study. He did not get a public answer.

Later, after the meeting, Slinkerd told Digital First Media he did not wait for the fire study to weight in because “that study is about operations and equipment. This is about the board of commission­ers.”

According to the “letter of intent” filed with the Pennsylvan­ia Department of Community and Economic Developmen­t, which will oversee the study conducted by a consultant, areas examined in the study will include:

• The fire company’s “ability to satisfacto­rily respond

to and extinguish fires as these tasks relate to generally accepted fire-fighting standards.”

• The scope of the assessment will include, “administra­tive and operationa­l leadership, personnel management, training, facilities and equipment.”

• It will also review “supporting governance documents and organizati­onal structure as well.”

• The study will also assess “future township fire protection needs.”

On Aug. 20, Slinkerd told the audience the board of commission­ers gets to appoint two members of the fire committee, one commission­er and one “member of the public at large.”

Until last night, those two members were Krazalkovi­ch and Schreiber.

Township Solicitor Charles D. Garner Jr. said the memorandum of understand­ing between the township and the fire company sets no terms for the commission­ers’ appointmen­ts to the fire company and thus, “the power to appoint is also the power to remove.”

Slinkerd said Schreiber’s

replacemen­t will be selected at the September meeting.

Asked by firefighte­r John DeMichael why he wanted Schreiber removed, Slinkerd said Schreiber has a “conflict of interest.”

Asked why he thought that, Slinkerd replied “because I think it is.”

However, after the meeting, he clarified he does not mean anything involving money, as the phrase can often suggest.

Rather, Slinkerd said, the fact that Schreiber is the vice president of the fire company this year, and was president of the fire company last year, and has been a member of the fire company and the fire committee from the first day he came on as a commission­er, creates a conflict for Schreiber as a commission­er in terms of which set of interests he represents.

Schreiber is “wearing so many different hats, I’m not sure his responsibi­lities as a commission­er are clear,” Slinkerd said.

For his part, Schrieber told Digital First Media he believes the issue is about “personalit­ies.”

Having asked after Slinkerd made his motion why he was “in a rush” and did not wait for the fire study, Schreiber said at the end of the meeting that he was “extremely disappoint­ed with the vote.”

“This is all related to that notorious meeting in January where buying the new fire truck was voted down,” Schreiber told the commission­ers.

At that meeting, the commission­ers voted 3-2 against spending $300,000 that was in the budget to buy a new truck that would have replaced a 1983 pumper purchased from the North End Fire Company in Pottstown and now so old that replacemen­t parts are nearly impossible to find.

At the time, Slinkerd said he had not been provided with adequate informatio­n in advance of the vote.

Outside, after the meeting Thomas Mattingly confirmed that he has been “expelled” as fire chief by the

fire company board “because of the letter.” Mattingly said will appeal the expulsion and said T.J. Wojton is now acting chief.

As Digital First Media reported last month, “the letter” to which Mattingly refers was one he wrote in May and sent to all commission­ers, Pottstown Borough Manager Justin Keller and former Pottstown fire chief Michael Lessar, who has since resigned for unrelated reasons.

In it, Mattingly complained about Lessar, Krazalkovi­ch, state Sen. Robert Mensch, R-24th Dist., and a captain in the West End Fire Company discussing Upper Pottsgrove Fire Company operations, response times and mutual aid, without getting input from Mattingly or other Upper Pottsgrove firefighte­rs.

In the letter, Mattingly called it “dishearten­ing” that Krazalkovi­ch, who is a member of the township’s fire committee, would seek

answers regarding incidents he had already asked Upper Pottsgrove’s firefighte­rs about.

“Those questions have been answered and discussed at length,” Mattingly wrote.

As the conflict has dragged on, there are more losses than Mattingly’s position as chief.

Schreiber told Digital First Media that at the beginning of the year, the fire company had between 30 to 35 volunteers.

Since the friction has begun and become more public “we’re down to about 10, said Schreiber. “This could have a real impact on fire safety in the township.”

“The lack of support from some of the commission­ers is draining our volunteer base and keeping people from wanting to join our company,” DeMichael said.

This story first appeared as a post in The Digital Notebook blog.

 ?? DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO ?? Upper Pottsgrove Fire Company and the township’s administra­tive offices share the same building at 1409 Farmington Ave.
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO Upper Pottsgrove Fire Company and the township’s administra­tive offices share the same building at 1409 Farmington Ave.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States