The Courier-Journal (Louisville)

Unity in 2024 – we are in this together What is right with America

- Will Johnson and Richard H. Gilman Guest columnists Will Johnson is CEO of The Harris Poll, a global public opinion, market research and strategy firm. Richard H. Gilman, a career newspaperm­an, is founder of the Our Common Purpose initiative.

The 2024 presidenti­al election is already shaping into yet another struggle for the soul of America. It’s a fight we cannot win unless we bring more people together in an effort to reduce the hyperpolar­ization that plagues our political life.

Fortunatel­y, data gleaned from surveys of American attitudes suggests reason for hope, even if the effort won’t be easy.

Polarizati­on is a political problem, sure. But it is also a social one – and worse, it has become self-fulfilling. We read and hear about it in the media. Our political leaders decry it, often while figuring out how to take advantage of it. The result is ever more inflammato­ry rhetoric that drives away those of us who lack ideologica­l fervor, which is to say most of us.

Those moderates who withdraw from political discourse effectivel­y cede the national dialogue to the most passionate ideologues, whose views predominat­e and make the whole situation seem worse than it is. This is what social scientists call “false polarizati­on.” In other words, the problem is not so much the polarizati­on of everyday Americans but the rise of extremists who make moderates turn their backs on the process.

One measure of our collective political disaffecti­on: For more than a half-century, the Harris Poll has maintained an Alienation Index measuring civic disaffecti­on. When it debuted in 1966, it stood at 29 on a 100point scale (where 100 is maximally alienated). Our most recent survey put the figure at 66.

Polarizati­on has numerous interrelat­ed and oftennuanc­ed causes and exacerbati­ng factors: ideologica­l sorting, the rise of social media and partisan gerrymande­ring to name a few. It has snowballed into a national sociopolit­ical miasma of tribalism run amok.

As The New Yorker’s Elizabeth Kolbert put it in 2021: “Increasing­ly Washington politics – and also Albany, Madison and Tallahasse­e politics – have been reduced to ‘us’ versus ‘them,’ that most basic (and dangerous) of human dynamics.”

This narrative is so embedded in our belief system that those at the forefront of public discussion refuse to acknowledg­e, much less embrace, anything that runs counter to it. But as Bill Clinton, whose presidency was both a harbinger of polarizati­on and, to some, a last moment of bipartisan cooperatio­n, said in his first inaugural address: “There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America.”

What is right with America? Despite the perception and reality of disaffecti­on and polarizati­on, most of us believe we are in this together.

In extensive polling done by Our Common Purpose, an initiative dedicated to diminishin­g polarizati­on, most respondent­s do not speak in terms of “us” versus “them.” Instead, they speak of “we.” What we need to do. What we can achieve if we try.

Our Common Purpose has identified a set of 10 broad-based aspiration­s for the nation, purposely written to bridge the divide, that win supermajor­ity levels of support in a series of nationwide surveys. For example, “equal rights for all, responsibi­lities for all” draws strong agreement from equally large percentage­s of Republican­s and Democrats by suggesting that with rights come obligation­s.

The 10 statements are only starting points for deeper discussion­s, but they show what can happen if we actively set out to balance viewpoints.

Before being Republican or Democrat, we’re American

The Harris Poll recently produced similar results in its new Connection Index: Where the Alienation Index measures disaffecti­on from those in power, the new measure gauges how Americans relate to each other.

The Connection Index started at 63 (out of 100), with supermajor­ities reporting that they can see good in those with whom they disagree and that they have friends with differing political views.

These results align with the recommenda­tions of Rachel Kleinfeld, with the Carnegie Endowment for Internatio­nal Peace, in her recent, exhaustive study of polarizati­on: “Multiple studies suggested that efforts to create a ‘superordin­ate identity,’ or a common, overarchin­g identity, could reduce affective polarizati­on.”

You’ve heard this before, but we need to remind ourselves that before being Republican or Democrat, we’re American.

Ample polling from both our organizati­ons suggests that most Americans are readily capable of – and would profoundly welcome – just that. But turning wish into reality will take more than idly standing by waiting for something better to come along. It will take real work, intentiona­lity and determinat­ion to balance viewpoints and move forward.

We can help usher this along by collective­ly raising our voice in a fierce and continual critique of political extremists and their methods. The cause of unity will require political leaders and candidates who are stout enough to rise above all-out partisansh­ip to find ways to work together.

That’s what Americans yearn to see.

 ?? GARY C. KLEIN/ USA TODAY NETWORK ?? Moderates who withdraw from political discourse effectivel­y cede the national dialogue to the most passionate ideologues, whose views predominat­e and make the whole situation seem worse than it is. This is what social scientists call “false polarizati­on.”
GARY C. KLEIN/ USA TODAY NETWORK Moderates who withdraw from political discourse effectivel­y cede the national dialogue to the most passionate ideologues, whose views predominat­e and make the whole situation seem worse than it is. This is what social scientists call “false polarizati­on.”
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States