The Courier-Journal (Louisville)

Gov. Beshear said he favors House Bill 509. What’s he trying to hide?

- Joseph Gerth

On Monday, The Courier Journal reported Rachel Greenberg, the wife of the mayor, had exchanged nearly 700 text messages with a city government employee, many of them directing the employee to do work related to Mayor Craig Greenberg’s social media accounts.

This all seems to fly in the face of Craig Greenberg’s repeated denials that his wife had a staff and was giving orders to employees. She was — his office repeatedly told us — “just a volunteer” or words to that effect.

But I’m not here to talk about the Greenbergs and this arrangemen­t that put workers like Nico Phillips in an incredibly difficult position: Does she do the job her boss wants her to do or do what the top boss’ wife tells her?

What I’m here to talk about is House Bill 509.

If that bill — which is hanging fire in the Kentucky Senate right now — were the current law, Courier Journal Reporters Eleanor McCrary and Josh Wood might have been able to get those texts from Rachel Greenberg’s personal cell phone that told the whole story Craig Greenberg didn’t want you to hear.

Under Kentucky law, messages sent or received by government employees and officials who use personal email or personal cell phones to conduct government business are obliged to turn over those emails and text messages if requested under the Kentucky Open Records Act.

Normally, what happens is if someone requests those documents, the employee or official is instructed by whatever bureaucrat is in charge of answering open records requests to search their phones and email accounts and screen-shot all work-related messages and turn them over.

Despite what it sounds like when State Rep. John Hodgson, the bill’s sponsor, talks about it, they don’t have to turn their phone over to some government employee who rifles through the phone reading messages they exchanged with their daughter having a difficult breakup with their boyfriend or the messages they exchanged with the woman they’re sneaking around with.

And personal emails and text messages like that have never been released — even Hodgson acknowledg­es that — and they never will.

The state open meetings law already excludes emails and texts that are purely private in nature.

Hodgson’s bill would require

government employees to provide government email accounts and cell phones to employees and officials and would require them to use those email accounts when doing the public’s business.

And it doesn’t say anything about requiring use of government phones.

The problem is, employees and public officials could use personal cell phones with impunity to conduct public business in private.

This is the second time in a couple of weeks there has been a real-life example of why Hodgson’s bill is bad.

An audit of what went wrong with Jefferson County Public Schools’ transporta­tion plan released recently found that some school employees were instructed to communicat­e by way of text because of the mistaken belief that text messages were not subject to the state open records law.

At a recent Senate committee meeting to discuss the bill, Michael Abate, who represents the Kentucky Press Associatio­n and The Courier Journal, testified the bill would allow school board members — during a school board meeting where they are supposed to conduct business in public — to text back and forth and carry on discussion­s in private.

It’s difficult to believe this bill is good for Kentucky in any way shape or form.

Now normally at this point in the legislativ­e session, we wouldn’t need to worry about this bill. If the Republican state legislator passed it, we could count on a Democratic governor to veto it.

It was a Democratic General Assembly that passed the Kentucky Open Records Act a half-century ago and, despite all the Democrats’ faults — and they have plenty — they have stood staunchly behind and protected the open records law for all these years.

While most vetoes in Kentucky are meaningles­s since it takes only a majority of both houses to override them, this one is different because Gov. Andy Beshear could wait until after the legislatur­e adjourns to nix the bill, a move the legislatur­e couldn’t overrule.

But Beshear, who is looking for higher office and has even been mentioned as potential presidenti­al or vice presidenti­al timber, is siding with the Republican­s here.

At a press conference last month, he said his office has worked with the Republican­s on the measure and that he favors it.

“This isn’t some big loophole where people can hide things,” he said.

It is.

“I believe that this will allow searches outside of the individual in question from the organizati­on, from the cabinet, from the board and through their general council that will provide more records, not less,” he went on to say.

That’s a flat-out lie.

As attorney general, Beshear oversaw the office that adjudicate­d open records cases − he knows better than that.

What is Beshear trying to hide?

Is there something on his phone that would keep him off a presidenti­al ticket or stop him from one day being a United States Senator?

Call him up and tell him to veto the bill if it gets to his desk.

His number is 502-564-2611.

I’d tell you to text him, but if this bill becomes law, he could just lie and say he never got it.

 ?? ??
 ?? MICHAEL CLEVENGER/COURIER JOURNAL ?? Gov. Andy Beshear has said he favors House Bill 509, which would allow him and other elected officials to hide what they say in text messages. Call him at 502-564-2611 and tell him, if it gets to his desk, he should veto it.
MICHAEL CLEVENGER/COURIER JOURNAL Gov. Andy Beshear has said he favors House Bill 509, which would allow him and other elected officials to hide what they say in text messages. Call him at 502-564-2611 and tell him, if it gets to his desk, he should veto it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States