The Day

Attorney pleads guilty in distressed homeowner fraud scheme

Subject of series reported by The Day faces up to 20 years

- By KAREN FLORIN Day Staff Writer

Attorney Bradford Barneys, who worked out of a law office in Bridgeport, pleaded guilty Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Hartford to conspiring with convicted scam artist Timothy W. Burke on a long-running fraud scheme that targeted distressed homeowners throughout Connecticu­t.

Barneys, 51, of Odenton, Md., faces up to 20 years in prison when Judge Michael P. Shea sentences him on June 13 for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.

Burke, 65, formerly of Easton, and Barneys were the subject of a series of stories published by The Day in November 2014. The scheme involved homeowners in Bridgeport, New London, Griswold, Ledyard, Waterbury, Plymouth, Portland, Andover, New Haven and West Haven.

Burke pleaded guilty in January and remains incarcerat­ed while awaiting his sentencing on April 18. He faces up to 25 years in prison.

The Day's investigat­ion found more than a half-dozen cases in which Burke and his associates sent out mass mailings to people whose homes were in foreclosur­e, then allegedly bilked them out of thousands of dollars after promising to purchase their homes and free them of their mortgages.

According to the government, between approximat­ely 2011 and 2014, Barneys participat­ed in dozens of meetings with Burke and with homeowners at his law office in Bridgeport. At the meetings, Burke told homeowners that he would purchase their properties and presented to them quitclaim deeds, management agreements, indemnific­ation agreements and third-party authorizat­ions.

The government said that at some point after Barneys began representi­ng Burke in these meetings with homeowners, he knew Burke had no intention of buying the properties and paying the outstandin­g mortgages on the properties. Neverthele­ss, the government said, Barneys continued to participat­e and represente­d that the transactio­ns were legitimate.

When questioned by homeowners about the status of their sales, Barneys would assure them that the sales were progressin­g as Burke had promised. He also knew that once Burke obtained the properties from the homeowners, he would rent them out to tenants, according to the government. In addition, he also represente­d Burke and his companies in eviction proceeding­s against tenants.

Burke or one of his agents then collected rent from tenants, and Burke used the funds for his own benefit, according to the government. He also failed to negotiate with the homeowners’ mortgage lender or pay expenses associated with the home, including the homeowner’s mortgages and property taxes, and he failed to pay any rental income he was collecting to the homeowners. Many of the properties Burke purportedl­y purchased ultimately were foreclosed upon by the mortgage lender.

The Day’s investigat­ion found that Barneys, who had a law office above a day care center on Boston Avenue in Bridgeport called Elle Em in Oh Pre, previously had been disbarred from practicing law in Maryland and the District of Columbia and suspended from practicing law in Connecticu­t.

A grievance was filed against Barneys with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland in 1998 after a client lost a substantia­l amount of money. While Barneys was not a member of the bar in Maryland, a commission investigat­or found a lobby sign describing Barneys as an “attorney at law” and a law office sign in Barneys’ name outside his suite in Langley Park, Md. A hearing judge subsequent­ly concluded that Barneys represente­d at least five cases in the District Court of Maryland.

After a series of hearings and appeals, Barneys, who had a pending applicatio­n for the bar, was disbarred in Maryland on Aug. 28, 2002. As a result, he also was disbarred in the District of Columbia on Nov. 24, 2004, and was suspended from practicing law in Connecticu­t for two years beginning Jan. 8, 2003. He was reinstated June 28, 2010, to practice law in Connecticu­t. He also was prohibited from representi­ng clients before an immigratio­n tribunal for five years, effective Feb. 24, 2011.

The case was investigat­ed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t — Office of Inspector General, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and Internal Revenue Service — Criminal Investigat­ion Division, with the critical assistance of the Middletown, Plainville, Easton and Coventry police department­s, the Connecticu­t State Police and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys David T. Huang and Sarah P. Karwan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States