The Day

Trump, Ryan split on tax cuts

President’s proposal is more generous to the middle-class

- By MAX EHRENFREUN­D

Washington — President Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan both want to re-write the tax code, but their proposals differ on how much tax relief to give the middle class.

Trump wants a tax cut across the board, according to the plan he published during the campaign. He has proposed relief for the wealthy especially, but also for less affluent households. The plan that Ryan, R-Wis., and his colleagues in the House have put forward would not substantia­lly reduce taxes for the middle class, and many households would pay more.

Trump’s plan arguably reflects his unique style of conservati­ve populism. The proposal would be extremely costly for the government, and the president’s past comments suggest he would be willing to put the federal government deeper into debt to fund breaks for the middle class.

Ryan’s plan would instead simplify and streamline the tax code in accordance with conservati­ve orthodoxy, eliminatin­g the goodies for households with modest incomes that Trump would preserve or expand.

In all, taxpayers with roughly average incomes could expect a tax cut of around $1,100 a year under Trump’s plan, compared to just $60 under Ryan’s plan once the proposals were fully implemente­d.

Now, after even a united Trump-Ryan effort on health care failed to win over enough Republican­s to get through the house, their hopes of passing a tax plan depend on getting on the same page quickly.

During the campaign, Trump proposed a plan that would have reduced taxes drasticall­y, especially for the wealthy but also for the poor and working class. Meanwhile, Ryan and his colleagues in the House put together a plan that was equally generous to the rich, but that would give poor and middle-class taxpayers less of a break. The speaker’s plan would even have increased taxes on some in the upper middle class.

After a decade, 99.6 percent of the tax relief Ryan proposed would have accrued to the wealthiest 1 percent of the country. In Trump’s plan, 50.8 percent of the relief would have gone to that group, according to analyses by the nonpartisa­n Tax Policy Center.

The two tax plans have important features in common. In terms of taxes on the rich, both plans would reduce the marginal rate paid by the wealthiest taxpayers on individual income from 39.6 percent to 33 percent.

And among those in the poorest fifth of households, the typical taxpayer would save about $100 under Ryan’s plan and about $120 under Trump’s.

The two plans would repeal some of the taxes that Obamacare imposed on the rich, and both plans also repeal the estate tax, which rich families pay when one of their members dies. Repealing the tax would return $300 billion or so to those families over a decade, according to the center, depending on the details of the plan.

Meanwhile, both plans would increase the amount that many families can earn without paying taxes — to $30,000 for a married couple in Trump’s plan and $24,000 in the proposal from Republican­s in the House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States