The Day

Trump scolds NATO allies

Nations react coldly to president’s lecture for more defense spending

- By MICHAEL A. MEMOLI

Brussels — President Donald Trump directly rebuked NATO allies for not paying their fair share of military costs, as they stood stone-faced nearby, and stopped short of reaffirmin­g the alliance’s mutual defense pledge as the foreign leaders met Thursday for a celebratio­n of unity.

The unusually pointed remarks at the dedication of the North Atlantic Treaty Organizati­on’s gleaming new headquarte­rs showed the limits of Trump’s recent warming to the nearly 70-year-old organizati­on, which, as a candidate, he lambasted as obsolete.

Compoundin­g the awkwardnes­s, Trump spoke beside a newly installed relic of the World Trade Center towers downed on Sept. 11, 2001. The twisted steel commemorat­ed the one and only time that NATO invoked its mutual defense pledge, Article 5 of its founding charter — in defense of the United States.

Candidate Trump’s skepticism about America’s key internatio­nal alliances seemed to have lessened by the time he arrived Wednesday in Brussels, the seat of the European Union and NATO’s headquarte­rs. Last month, Trump declared that NATO was no longer obsolete, thanks in large part to his prodding.

But by his remarks Thursday, the “America first” president reprised his core critique about what he called allies’

“chronic underpayme­nts,” and did so face to face with his counterpar­ts in NATO. Several looked disgusted, and some exchanged glances and whispers.

Trump noted that the United States has spent more on defense in eight years than the other 27 member countries combined, and that 23 of the countries still don’t meet a NATO target of spending 2 percent of their respective nations’ economic output on defense.

“This is not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States,” Trump said. “Many of these nations owe massive amounts of money from past years.”

“We have to make up for the many years lost,” he added.

For European allies, the skepticism remains mutual. NATO members had hoped that Trump explicitly would endorse Article 5, but he did not. He did, however, approvingl­y note that after Sept. 11, “our NATO allies responded swiftly and decisively, invoking for the first time in its history the Article 5 collective defense commitment­s.”

It is a measure of allies’ worries about Trump that they needed to hear a more fulsome endorsemen­t of the defense pact.

Speaking to reporters after the leaders’ working dinner, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenber­g played down the omission. Just by speaking at the commemorat­ion, Trump “sent a strong signal,” Stoltenber­g said.

“We have heard President Trump before being very blunt on the message of fair burden sharing,” he said. “Several allies expressed that we have to invest in defense not just to please the United States. We have to invest in defense also because it is in our interest to do so.”

Separately, NATO members agreed to formally join the U.S.-led coalition battling Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, as the Trump administra­tion wanted. The move is mostly symbolic, however, since NATO members already are in the coalition as individual states, and NATO is not being asked to take a combat role but will provide tactical support.

Trump’s lecture on NATO nations’ defense spending came at the moment intended to call attention to the time the alliance came to the aid of the United States in Afghanista­n, where more than 1,000 non-American NATO personnel died. The steel from the World Trade Center’s North Tower is called the “Article V artifact,” symbolizin­g the NATO provision that says an attack on one member would be considered an attack on all.

Also unveiled, by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, was a section of the Berlin Wall intended to evoke the founding purpose of NATO as a check on the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

In her remarks, Merkel seemed to send a statement as well, to Trump.

“It is not isolation or the building of walls that will make us successful, but the sharing of values,” Merkel said, bringing to mind Trump’s promised wall on the U.S.-Mexico border as much as the long-fallen Berlin Wall.

A new point of tension between Merkel and Trump was suggested by the German magazine Der Spiegel, which reported that Trump in a discussion about trade said, “The Germans are bad, very bad. See the millions of cars they are selling to the U.S.? Terrible. We will stop this.”

Just hours before the NATO ceremony, in Berlin, Merkel sat side by side with former President Barack Obama, with whom she enjoyed a close partnershi­p. Obama, like presidents before him, also pushed NATO members to ramp up defense spending.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States