The Day

Like it or not, Trump owns ‘Obamacare’

President will need to be ‘caretaker’ to avoid possible blame if law fails

- By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

Washington — With Republican­s unable to advance a health care bill in Congress, President Donald Trump’s administra­tion may find itself in an awkward role as caretaker of the Affordable Care Act, which he still promises to repeal and replace.

The Constituti­on says presidents “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” So as long as former President Barack Obama’s law is on the books, that doesn’t seem to leave much choice for Trump, even if he considers the law to be “a disaster.”

“It’s either caretaker or undertaker,” quipped economist Joe Antos of the business-oriented American Enterprise Institute. “I think in the end it’s going to be ‘caretaker’ because they’ll finally realize nobody is going to blame Obama. Having the thing blow up is going to be considered in the public eye to be Trump’s fault.”

Every move by Trump’s health chief will be scrutinize­d by Democrats for evidence of “sabotage,” a charge they’re already making. Meanwhile, the administra­tion will try to use its rule-making power to bend Obama’s law toward Republican priorities.

The Trump administra­tion’s first sign-up season, for 2018 coverage, starts in about three months, on Nov. 1.

Some things to watch for:

Intense scrutiny

Consumer organizati­ons, state officials, Democrats, insurers, and groups representi­ng various health care interests will keep close tabs on the actions of Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price and his deputy, Seema Verma, who runs the federal agency that administer­s health insurance programs.

Intimately familiar with HealthCare.gov, former Obama administra­tion officials will be looking over the shoulders of the Trump team — Twitter accounts at the ready.

“We are going to hold HHS accountabl­e to fully implement the law,” said lawyer Mara Youdelman, who heads the Washington office of the National Health Law Program, an advocacy group. “The Affordable Care Act is the law of the land, and everyone who is working for the administra­tion should be committed to upholding the law of the land.”

Don’t overlook that computer system

Few things were as damaging to Obama’s aura of cool competence as the failure of HealthCare.gov’s computer system when it went live in the fall of 2013. Few people managed to sign up that first day, and it took weeks for a technologi­cal rescue team to sort through layers of problems, restoring acceptable functional­ity.

After that chastening experience, Obama administra­tion officials constantly kept tinkering with the website, trying to improve its technical capacity and usability for consumers.

It’s unclear what the Trump administra­tion has been doing since he took office in January. No media preview of 2018 open enrollment has been announced.

The administra­tion may have made its own job harder by cutting in half the sign-up season for next year. This time, open enrollment will run from Nov. 1-Dec. 15. Previously, it ran through Jan. 31.

In earlier years, Dec. 15 was a big day for HealthCare.gov because it was the last opportunit­y to sign up for coverage effective Jan. 1.

This year the Dec. 15 crunch could be even more overwhelmi­ng, because it’s also the last chance for most people to sign up for the coming year. It falls on a Friday — HealthCare.gov’s “Black Friday.”

“The Affordable Care Act is the law of the land, and everyone who is working for the administra­tion should be committed to upholding the law of the land.” MARA YOUDELMAN NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM

Uncertaint­y over subsidies

The clearest signal Trump could send of his administra­tion’s good faith would be to remove the uncertaint­y around billions of dollars in payments to insurers. That money reimburses the insurers for reducing co-payments and deductible­s for people with modest incomes.

The “cost-sharing” subsidies are called for in the health law, but they are under a legal cloud because of a lawsuit brought earlier by House Republican­s, questionin­g whether the law included a specific instructio­n for the government to pay the money.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States