The Day

Dominion reviews agencies’ request for data

Millstone’s expected performanc­e, expenses, revenues will be used in economic viability study

- By KIMBERLY DRELICH Day Staff Writer

Hartford — State agencies have requested data related to the Millstone Power Station’s expected performanc­e, expenses and revenues, including 10 years’ worth of annual financial statements, as they begin a study on the nuclear plant’s economic viability.

The state Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection and the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority are requesting the data by Aug. 29. The data will help them build a “base case” for Millstone through 2035 that will enable the state agencies to assess its economic viability, according to a presentati­on during a public hearing Thursday at DEEP headquarte­rs.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy had ordered the agencies to complete the study and present the results to him and the legislatur­e by Feb. 1, 2018.

Plant owner Dominion received the request Tuesday night, said Kevin Hennessy, the company’s director of federal, state and local affairs in New England.

“We’re reviewing it, and we will respond in due time,” he said.

The agencies outlined the process for their study on Millstone and the role of nuclear energy and other energy sources in the state.

During the public hearing on the scope of the study, as well as in written comments submitted for the hearing, some continued to call on Dominion to release financial informatio­n about Millstone, while others emphasized Millstone’s role in providing energy and jobs for the state. No representa­tives from Dominion spoke during the hearing.

David Thomas, an AARP volunteer representi­ng ratepayers, said the AARP is not against nuclear power, but said there would have to be a demonstrat­ed need before the state

should consider a “special deal” for Millstone.

“In that case, they need to open up their books and demonstrat­e that particular need,” he said.

John Thompson, a consumer and also an electricia­n with IBEW Local 90 who has worked on the Millstone site, mentioned that Connecticu­t Yankee Nuclear Power Plant and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant are already gone and said he was concerned about the impact if Millstone shuts down.

“I’m concerned about the economic impact on that area of the state. We lost a lot of businesses already, so what’s that going to look like going forward for taxpayers, not just ratepayers?” he said. “When you look at supply and demand, you lose another supplier, the demand’s not going to change, so what’s that going to do to the overall cost?”

James Shuckerow, director of electric supply for Eversource Energy, said financial informatio­n from Dominion is critical to the study. He recommende­d the study focus on Millstone’s projected operations and expenses for the upcoming five-year period.

State Sen. Paul Formica, R-East Lyme, said in written testimony that Millstone provides the equivalent of 50 percent of the power used each day in Connecticu­t and “generates a $1.5 billion dollar fiscal impact” in the state.

“I encourage DEEP/PURA to complete this report and its recommenda­tions as soon as possible, as this docket will be running in concert with Dominion’s strategic assessment of Millstone,” he said. “There would be nothing more regrettabl­e than DEEP/PURA recommendi­ng appropriat­e action to keep Millstone open after they (Dominion) had already started turning off the lights.”

State Rep. Kathleen McCarty, R-Waterford, said that, “As a state, we cannot afford to lose our nuclear power plant for many reasons including, but not limited to, the adverse negative impact a premature closing of Millstone would have on the environmen­t, the economy, and the cost of electricit­y in the State of Connecticu­t.”

Arthur Wickson, a retired Millstone employee, called for a “true audit” of Millstone in his written comments.

“Let natural gas lines in from shale gas areas to allow true competitio­n,” he continued. “Power lines left from Connecticu­t Yankee in Haddam Neck would be ideal for a new combined gas generator.”

Dominion said in June that it was beginning a strategic assessment of its plans for Millstone, after legislatio­n failed in the General Assembly that would have allowed the state to study nuclear power plants and then potentiall­y open up a competitiv­e procuremen­t process, currently reserved for renewable and other low-emissions electricit­y providers, to the nuclear plant.

Dominion has been continuing to seek legislativ­e action.

The Stop the Millstone Payout coalition, a group opposed to legislatio­n affecting Millstone that includes Calpine Corp., Dynegy, NRG Energy, and the Electric Power Supply Associatio­n, issued a news release following Thursday’s hearing and continued to express opposition: “To date, Millstone has refused to let policymake­rs see their financials to determine whether the company actually needs additional money,” the release stated.

Dominion says it is seeking the opportunit­y to participat­e in a state-sponsored competitiv­e procuremen­t process, which is open to every other energy resource, except for nuclear and two other resources.

“No other bidder has provided financial informatio­n for this opportunit­y,” Dominion said. “Millstone should be treated equally.”

“Because it is a bid process, if it’s not a good deal for ratepayers, the state doesn’t have to accept it,” Dominion added. “It’s in our best interest to put forward a bid that helps ratepayers lower their electric bills, which are the highest in the continenta­l United States, while at the same time providing Millstone some degree of certainty.”

During Thursday’s hearing, DEEP and PURA said they envision the study will include the background on the current electricit­y market and the state’s emission goals, as well as an assessment of the economic viability of Millstone and what would happen if the plant was retired. The state agencies will offer possible mechanisms to either retain or replace Millstone, including no action, according to the presentati­on.

The data requested from Dominion includes 30 items, including annual financial statements from 2007 to 2017, and informatio­n on capacity and future performanc­e. The agencies also ask for informatio­n on a potential shutdown of Unit 2 or Unit 3, or both, such as how long it would take for the nuclear fuel to be put in storage casks.

In addition to analyzing Millstone, the study also will consider the role of nuclear energy, hydropower, demand reduction, energy storage and emissions-free renewable energy “in helping Connecticu­t meet interim and long-term carbon and other emissions targets, at the least cost and with greatest net benefit to Connecticu­t ratepayers, while maintainin­g the reliabilit­y of Connecticu­t’s electric grid,” according to Thursday’s presentati­on.

The agencies will issue a draft report and hold public meetings in Hartford and southeaste­rn Connecticu­t in December, according to a tentative schedule.

The data will help build a “base case” for Millstone through 2035 that will enable the state agencies to assess its economic viability, according to a presentati­on during a public hearing Thursday at DEEP headquarte­rs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States