The Day

Police body camera panel hasn’t met yet; NAACP upset

- By DAVE COLLINS

Hartford — A Connecticu­t task force on police body cameras that was created in July amid calls for more accountabi­lity in law enforcemen­t has yet to meet because lawmakers have appointed only five of the 26 members, an Associated Press review has found.

The panel was supposed to issue a report to the legislatur­e by Feb. 1 on ways to increase police body camera use and other issues. Legislativ­e leaders said last year’s state budget impasse put many things on hold, including appointmen­ts to the task force, whose work may be delayed a year.

Connecticu­t NAACP President Scot X. Esdaile on Wednesday said police body cameras are an issue of urgent importance and he called for an investigat­ion of lawmakers’ failure to set up the panel, in response to the AP findings.

“Here in Connecticu­t and all across the nation law enforcemen­t has been involved in killing unarmed people and walking away with no consequenc­es,” Esdaile said. “We fought for these cameras to ensure that officers will be held accountabl­e for police misconduct. We’re talking about life and death situations and unchecked police department­s.”

He said he planned to ask the legislatur­e’s Black and Puerto Rican Caucus to investigat­e.

The legislatur­e’s Judiciary Committee is overseeing the task force. Rep. William Tong, a Stamford Democrat who cochairs the committee, said the state budget consumed a lot of lawmakers’ time and it has been difficult to find qualified appointees to such panels. He said the task force will be fully appointed and do its work, but its recommenda­tions may not be debated until the 2019 legislativ­e session.

“I don’t think it’s troubling,” Tong said about the delay in task force appointmen­ts. “It continues to be an important area of focus for us. We’ve never stopped focusing on it.”

The task force was created in a bill signed into law by Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy in July, after few police department­s showed interest in a $15 million state reimbursem­ent program for body camera costs. The new law also expanded the reimbursem­ent program to include the cost of putting cameras on police stun guns and cruiser dashboards.

A year before the task force was approved, only 12 of the more than 100 law enforcemen­t agencies in the state had contacted officials about receiving reimbursem­ent. Several police chiefs, like their counterpar­ts around the country, said they were concerned about the high cost of storing video, how public requests for body camera video should be handled and other issues.

As of Wednesday, the reimbursem­ent program had shelled out about $2.6 million to 23 city and town department­s, and six additional municipali­ties had pending applicatio­ns for reimbursem­ent, according to the state Office of Policy and Management.

David McGuire, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticu­t, is one of the five people appointed to the task force so far. He said the panel is supposed to look into why more department­s are not taking advantage of the reimbursem­ent program, how to lower video storage costs and other issues.

He said a state data farm and other measures to lower video storage costs could be the spark needed to get more police department­s to use body cameras. He also said there need to be policies on public access to body camera video.

“We are concerned that the task force didn’t materializ­e,” McGuire said, referring to ACLU officials. “But we remain committed to make sure body cameras are implemente­d here in Connecticu­t. There are still a lot of issues out there that need to be grappled with.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States