The Day

Bill requires work for Medicaid

Some Republican­s in the legislatur­e support condition applying to able-bodied recipients

- By MACKENZIE RIGG

A number of legislativ­e Republican­s are advocating a bill aimed at imposing work requiremen­ts for some Medicaid recipients while also doing away with exemptions from work requiremen­ts now allowed to some food stamp recipients in Connecticu­t.

The bill would require the state Department of Social Services to apply for a federal waiver allowing the state to impose work or community service requiremen­ts on some adult, able-bodied Medicaid recipients, a request that the Trump administra­tion already has approved for three states.

The bill also would prohibit DSS from applying for a federal waiver that drops current work requiremen­ts for food stamp recipients who don't have dependents and live in areas with higher unemployme­nt rates and job scarcity. The U.S. Department of Agricultur­e is now considerin­g ending those waivers.

In written testimony, DSS Commission­er Roderick Bremby said he opposes the bill for many reasons, including that the Medicaid work requiremen­ts don't align with the purpose of Medicaid; that limiting food stamp benefits would directly

affect local economies across the state; and that it would be expensive to implement.

According to DSS, 800,000 residents are enrolled in Medicaid and 400,000 residents, or 200,000 households, are enrolled in food stamps. Medicaid is funded by the state and federal government­s, while the food stamps program is fully funded by the federal government.

The work-requiremen­t bill will have a public hearing in front of the Human Services Committee at 11 a.m. on Thursday in Room 2A in the Legislativ­e Office Building.

In January, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services sent a letter to states, saying that it would, for the first time, allow them to craft programs that would require Medicaid recipients to prove they are working, training for a job or volunteeri­ng in their communitie­s.

The letter said the policy was “anchored in historic CMS principles that emphasize work to promote health and well-being.” The action reverses the policy of previous Democratic and Republican administra­tions, which held that the work requiremen­ts didn’t further the program’s purposes of promoting coverage and access, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Several states have sought approval, and so far, Kentucky, Indiana and Arkansas have received waivers allowing Medicaid work requiremen­ts. Kentucky is facing a federal lawsuit aimed at blocking implementa­tion of the program.

In January, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said he would not impose work requiremen­ts on Medicaid recipients, saying the policy would “cause real harm to families across the country.”

Under the Connecticu­t bill, many Medicaid recipients still would be exempt from work or community service requiremen­ts, including those under 18 years old and over 64, people with disabiliti­es, pregnant women, the sole caretaker of a dependent child or a person with disabiliti­es, and a student enrolled full-time in either a secondary or post-secondary school.

Extensions also would be granted to those who live in higher unemployme­nt areas and can’t find or afford transporta­tion to work or do community service.

The food stamp program — officially known as the Supplement­al Nutrition Assistance Program — has had work requiremen­ts on and off for years for “able-boded adults without dependents.”

Current federal legislatio­n mandates that states require these individual­s ages 18 to 50 to meet work requiremen­ts to be eligible for SNAP for more than three months during a 36-month period, according to DSS.

States can apply for a oneyear waiver of these work requiremen­ts, and DSS has sought and received approval to waive them for 2018 in 114 towns and cities.

Sen. Joe Markley of Southingto­n, the Human Service Committee’s Republican cochair, said on Friday the committee had received several proposals for work requiremen­ts from Republican legislator­s. In February, Markley said, the committee’s leadership attended a presentati­on by the Foundation for Government Accountabi­lity, a conservati­ve think tank that favors work requiremen­ts.

“If you listened to what they said, it was very impressive,” Markley said. “The notion is getting a job is the best thing that can happen to anyone who is on assistance, and that it’s good in a lot of ways, and it’s good for the state in terms of expenses.”

Markley said he hasn’t decided yet whether he supports the bill and is still gathering informatio­n to assess the advantages and disadvanta­ges of such requiremen­ts.

Rep. Cathy Abercrombi­e, D-Meriden, co-chair of the Human Services Committee, said Saturday that she opposes the bill.

“I have no intention of changing the SNAP program,” she said.

In regards to the Medicaid work requiremen­ts, she said, “I don’t think there’s a need for it.”

She said Medicaid expenses in fiscal year 2018 were lower than in 2014. “It’s a waste of our time, and I don’t think there’s any financial gain we’ll get from it.”

DSS’s Bremby, in his written testimony, said the department’s data shows that 72 percent of Medicaid enrollees either are employed or are children under 19, adults over 65, or persons with disabiliti­es.

He also testified that imposing work requiremen­ts would be “administra­tively complex and costly” since the department would have to develop a way to track and document compliance or exemptions for more than 800,000 people.

Sen. Rob Sampson, R-Wolcott, said he supported the bill and has signed as a co-sponsor.

“I believe we should have a safety net, and there’s a certain percentage of the population we should look after and take care of,” Sampson said. “The question is who falls into that category and who doesn’t. I want to make sure we’re not taking care of people that do not need this help because it takes away from people who genuinely need assistance.”

“When you’re talking about a 30-year-old man with no dependents and no impediment­s physically or mentally, for example, I think their best shot at a bright future ... is to actually be in a position to work and provide for themselves,” he said. “I want to inspire that as much as possible.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States