Robert Smigel on the unusually naturalistic Adam Sandler Netflix comedy ‘The Week Of’
Even as he makes his feature directing debut with the recent release of “The Week Of” on Netflix, Robert Smigel already has a long legacy in the world of comedy.
He was a writer for “Saturday Night Live” — including the “Saturday TV Funhouse” cartoons — created and performed the Triumph the Insult Comic Dog character while the original head writer and producer at “Late Night With Conan O'Brien” and co-wrote and executive produced Adam Sandler's “You Don't Mess With the Zohan” along with two animated “Hotel Transylvania” films.
Co-written by Smigel and Sandler, “The Week Of” stars Sandler along with Chris Rock as two parents whose children are about to get married. Sandler, father of the bride, is a Long Island contractor struggling to foot the bill for the wedding. Rock, father of the groom, is a successful Beverly Hills surgeon who is caddishly absent from his family and typically tries to buy their affections.
Over the course of a few days, things grow progressively out of control.
The cast also features Rachel Dratch, Steve Buscemi, Allison Strong, Rob Morgan, Roland Buck III and Nasser Faris.
There is something unexpectedly soothing about the movie, particularly given the rancorous cultural moment into which it is being released. It warmly acknowledges issues of cultural difference and identity while also celebrating family and connection. The film finds the balance of emotional earnestness and arbitrary silliness that Sandler has often striven for in his own work but rarely brought to screen quite so gracefully.
“The Week Of” may be overlooked by people who assume that anything related to Sandler's production deal at Netflix has been an outlet for his lesser, lazier impulses. While that may have been true with western spoof “The Ridiculous 6” and action parody “The Do-Over,” as with the showbiz self-reflection of “Sandy Wexler,” in “The Week Of” there is something sweet and grounded in its look at family life.
Smigel recently got on the phone from New York for a brief interview on his ongoing collaboration with Sandler and taking on directing for the first time.
Q: I have to admit I was surprised to realize this is the first thing you've directed. I just assumed you had directed somewhere along the way.
A: I've hovered a lot on some of the movies I've worked on but never really directed. And I guess I have done some version of directing with the cartoons I did on “Saturday Night Live” — I was never a credited director, but I worked closely with the animation directors. And my Triumph scenes never had a director, so I guess I was the director of those, telling the cameraman where to go and editing them and all that. But this was the first time I've ever been an official director in any kind of capacity where I've actually had the full responsibility. It's something that I was never that interested in doing.
I started getting involved with some of Adam's movies, I co-wrote the “Zohan” movie … we had this very talented director, and Adam himself pretty much has final say on every aspect of the production. As a co-writer and (executive producer) on that movie, he wanted me to flag anything. I was heavily involved in casting and even went on the set, in terms of acting notes sometimes and shot notes if I had them. And the “Hotel Transylvania” movies, by then I had a lot of animation experience (and it was) a similar situation — I'd give notes on the animation and work with the actors.
So I had a lot of experience doing stuff like directing. But I kind of avoided it because I felt satisfied — like I have plenty of input, and why would I want to direct and have to be there at 6:30 in the morning and be the last one to leave? I felt like I had enough impact on the movies I'd worked on. But he really wanted me to direct this one, and I was very attracted to the approach he wanted. You've seen the movie, yes? Did it feel a little different?
Q: Yes. I listened to an interview with Adam where he said he was a little nervous about the tone of the movie. How would you describe what's different about it?
A: Well, “Zohan” was about as high concept an idea as we could have. It had an inherently sweet character and an inherently sweet aspiration at its heart, so it was easy to make it incredibly broad and still be able to have moments where you felt something for the character. This movie, I wouldn't call this high concept at all. It's a very grounded and relatable story, that doesn't necessarily lend itself to the silliest, broadest comedy. And that was fine with me.
It's going to sound funny, because you just imagine Adam saying it in his goofiest voice, but he made it clear when he pitched me the initial idea that he wanted it to feel much more verite. That word alone out of Adam's mouth — verite. He wanted it to feel like a naturalistic ensemble movie, and we even talked about directors like (John) Cassavetes. The movie is not like a Cassavetes movie, but I was attracted to the idea of doing something that felt like it had a different energy than a typical summer comedy. And suddenly the idea of writing it and directing it was that much more exciting.
Q: I don't want to put you in the position of speaking for Adam, but it can be confusing to understand what his impulses are moving between projects like Noah Baumbach's “The Meyerowitz Stories” or working with James L. Brooks or Paul Thomas Anderson, and the broader comedy of his own movies. And this movie feels like a project coming from his shop that is more aligned with the work he does with other directors.
A: I'm glad to hear that. We were taking a pretty big swing … I was hoping people would notice this doesn't look like or feel like a regular summer comedy. And it's not by accident, it's by design.
I think Adam has always admired those kinds of filmmakers and those kinds of films. I think he just follows his impulses in terms of what he finds funny, but just because he loves movies that people like Paul Thomas Anderson and Noah Baumbach do, it doesn't necessarily follow that he thinks every idea that he has lends itself to that kind of treatment. So he's perfectly happy to just make straight-on funny comedies.
This movie allowed me to write toward that (naturalistic) style. The whole thing felt like a situation where I could actually enhance the script with some interesting directing.