The Day

GOP immigratio­n bill would allow lawsuits against ‘sanctuarie­s’

- By ANA RADELAT Ana Radelat is a reporter for The Connecticu­t Mirror (www. ctmirror.org). Copyright 2018 © The Connecticu­t Mirror.

Washington — A House Republican immigratio­n bill adopts a new tactic to penalize “sanctuary” cities and states – making it easier to sue them.

The legislatio­n aims to penalize states like Connecticu­t and California that fail to respond to requests from federal immigratio­n authoritie­s to hold prisoners past their release dates so they can be picked up and deported.

Courts have ruled that compliance with those requests, called “detainers,” is voluntary.

Connecticu­t in 2013 passed the “Trust Act” that allows state and local law enforcemen­t agencies to ignore a federal detainer for an immigrant if he or she hasn’t committed a serious felony.

So the state, and several Connecticu­t cities including Hartford and New Haven, don’t comply with all federal detainers.

The immigratio­n bill, which could be voted on this week, would make jurisdicti­ons that refuse to cooperate with immigratio­n authoritie­s liable for some crimes committed by the undocument­ed immigrants they release.

Under the bill, jurisdicti­ons that decline detainer requests could face lawsuits if an immigrant they release commits murder, rape or sexual abuse of a child. The victim of the crime or the victim’s relative would be allowed to sue the jurisdicti­on, as long as the immigrant is convicted of the crime and sentenced to at least one year in prison.

The bill also would require jurisdicti­ons to hold an immigrant up to 96 hours after his or her release date if that immigrant is subject to a detainer request from U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t. It also would shield these jurisdicti­ons from lawsuits against them for declining to immediatel­y release prisoners whose jail terms were completed.

“This proposal is another attempt by Trump’s Republican Party to advance their goal of sowing fear and anxiety, but it falls short of making communitie­s across the nation safer,” said Leigh Appleby, a spokesman for Gov. Dannel Malloy.

Appleby said the proposal is “likely unconstitu­tional on several grounds, and some components are already subject to ongoing litigation.”

“It’s getting harder to believe that they are serious about lowering crime and seems as though they are more concerned about their own midterm elections,” Appleaby said.

The new detainer policy is part of a massive immigratio­n bill that’s considered a compromise between moderate and conservati­ve House Republican­s. It would provide a path to citizenshi­p for young undocument­ed immigrants but restricts legal immigratio­n, limits asylum claims and budgets $25 billion for the constructi­on of a border wall and other border security measures.

House Republican­s also will consider a more restrictiv­e bill that would limit legal immigratio­n even further, provide more money for President Donald Trump’s border wall and protect young immigrants known as “Dreamers” from deportatio­n, but would not give them a path to citizenshi­p.

Trump met with House Republican­s Tuesday evening about the proposed immigratio­n bills, amid increasing criticism of his administra­tion’s policy of separating children from their parents at the border.

He did not endorse either of the Republican immigratio­n bills but said he would support any bill that passed. The legislatio­n is not expected to have much, if any, Democratic support, so the GOP, which has a majority in the chamber, can’t have many defections.

“I’m with you 100 percent!” Trump told the GOP lawmakers. “I will not leave you in the wilderness.”

Rep. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., said Trump laid out his main principles on immigratio­n and told Republican­s he “wanted to take care of the kids,” referring to the family separation crisis. Other Republican lawmakers said they were not sure what Trump meant.

Trump has claimed family separation­s at the border are “a result of Democrat-supported loopholes in our federal laws.” But they are actually the result of a Trump administra­tion decision to prosecuted 100 percent of the adults caught crossing the border illegally even if they came with children, who under law can’t be detained in a federal facility.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States