The Day

Attorneys argue for reuniting kids in Noank with parents

At hearing, doctor says they have PTSD after separation at the border

- By LINDSAY BOYLE Day Staff Writer

Bridgeport — The two children who have been living in a Noank shelter since being separated from their parents earlier this year have post-traumatic stress disorder and should rejoin their parents “as expeditiou­sly as possible,” a doctor said Wednesday during a U.S. District Court hearing.

The hearing came after attorneys last week sued the federal government on behalf of the children: a 14-year-old girl from El Salvador identified as V.F.B. and a 9-year-old boy from Honduras identified as J.S.R.

The pair have been staying in a 12bed shelter run by Noank Community Support Services. The nonprofit is the only one in Connecticu­t that receives “unaccompan­ied alien children” under a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services program. A threeyear, $1.7 million grant from the same department funds the shelter, which has a clinician, a nurse, a teacher and case managers on staff.

In court, Yale professor Marisol Orihuela urged Judge Victor A. Bolden to reunite the children with their parents immediatel­y and outside of detention.

Orihuela called Dr. Andres Martin as a witness. Martin, also a Yale professor and medical director of Children’s Psychiatri­c Inpatient Service at the Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital, described the children’s PTSD and echoed Orihuela’s plea.

V.F.B. and J.S.R. are two of an estimated 3,000 who remain separated from their families because of a

controvers­ial zero-tolerance policy announced in April. Under it, U.S. officials jailed every adult caught illegally crossing the border or trying to do so, both misdemeano­r offenses. Officials sent accompanyi­ng children to warehouses or smaller shelters like the one in Noank.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he implemente­d the policy in reaction to a 203 percent increase in illegal border crossings from March 2017 to March 2018.

Amid a backlash, President Donald Trump signed an executive order ending the separation in favor of jailing families together. A California federal judge ruled Monday, however, that Trump’s effort to hold immigrant families in long-term facilities was a “cynical attempt” to undo a longstandi­ng court settlement, the Associated Press reported.

Attorneys representi­ng the children — they’re with Connecticu­t Legal Services and the Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic at Yale Law School — claim the forcible separation denied the children due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. In an opening statement, Bolden said the California ruling makes it likely that claim has merit.

With the help of a translator in court, V.F.B.’s mother and J.S.R.’s father watched and listened via teleconfer­ence from a Texas detention center. The pair were disconnect­ed twice during the first hour of the hearing, which began 45 minutes later than its scheduled 11:30 a.m. start.

A representa­tive of Connecticu­t Legal Services said the judge took what he heard on advisement and, short of setting a status hearing for July 18, made no ruling. The representa­tive said the group hopes the federal government will move to reunite the children before that but won’t consider the case over until the families are together outside of custody.

The U.S. Department of Justice has argued that the government already is facilitati­ng a path for reunificat­ion of the families.

Before the hearing, almost 100 people gathered in front of the courthouse to support the separated families. Vanesa Suarez, an organizer with New Haven-based Unidad Latina en Acción, said attorneys had motioned to get the parents there in person to no avail.

“We cannot expect children to understand the concept of borders,” said Suarez, whose own sister was detained by U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t about four years ago. “What do you tell these children when they’re being ripped from their families? We want them to know that we stand in solidarity with all of them. Our children are not guinea pigs.”

During the rally, Jonathan Gonzalez Cruz called on participan­ts to imagine a time they had been separated from their children, such as for a split second in a mall.

“Imagine the fear that goes through you, and then the relief when you see them again,” said Gonzalez Cruz, who’s a civic engagement coordinato­r with Connecticu­t Students for a Dream. “There are parents right now that don’t have that relief.”

Afterward, he said he feels connected to the separated children because his own father was deported to Mexico when he was a sophomore in high school.

“It’s important to show support to let the two children know there are people rooting for them,” Gonzalez Cruz said. “It’s also to show this work is important ... because if this case is effective in reuniting the families, it’s going to set precedent.”

Another speaker, 21-yearold Larissa Martinez, thanked those in attendance for their support.

“We don’t get to come to a rally and go home and forget about it,” said the Yale student, who came to this country eight years ago from Mexico City. “Everything is threatened by the fear of deportatio­n, of having ICE knocking at my door, at my family’s door.”

A majority of those crossing the U.S.-Mexico border are fleeing from violent Central American countries. Many seek asylum, which is a legal process.

 ?? LINDSAY BOYLE/THE DAY ?? People rally in front of the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport on Wednesday before the hearing for two children separated from their families and being housed in Noank.
LINDSAY BOYLE/THE DAY People rally in front of the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport on Wednesday before the hearing for two children separated from their families and being housed in Noank.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States