The Day

Gender war politics grip Senate over accusation

- By LAURIE KELLMAN

Washington — Nowhere is gender politics thicker in the election season air than in the mannerly U.S. Senate as it considers what President Donald Trump’s choice for the Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh, did or didn’t do in high school.

Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation of sexual assault — and Kavanaugh’s staunch denial — has ignited a tense, gender-infused war among the Senate’s 100 members, 23 of whom are women.

Whether Kavanaugh and Ford testify under oath, and to what details, has enormous stakes for President Donald Trump and the Nov. 6 midterm elections — not to mention American men, women, teenagers, parents, schools and anyone who rises to the top of a profession in the #MeToo era.

A look at how it’s playing out in the Senate:

State of play

Ford says she doesn’t want to publicly testify until the FBI adds to Kavanaugh’s background check by investigat­ing her allegation. Her lawyers wrote to the Senate Judiciary Committee saying Ford wants to cooperate. But in the days since she publicly accused Kavanaugh of assaulting her at a party more than three decades ago, the lawyers said, she has been the target of “vicious harassment and even death threats.” Her family has relocated, they said.

Republican­s are rejecting Ford’s call for an FBI investigat­ion, putting the onus back on her to decide whether she’ll testify anyway. They say she can testify in a private session if she wishes. Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, on Wednesday also offered to send his staff to Ford, “at a time and place convenient to her.”

Trump, counseled not to dismiss or insult Ford as he has other women accusing him of sexual misconduct, has showered sympathy on his embattled nominee and said he wants to hear from Ford. He also rejected the idea of bringing in the FBI. (Trump, too, has denied all accusation­s against him.)

Key factoids

For now, the ball is the committee’s to play, but precedent and some key numbers put the GOP majority in an exquisitel­y uncomforta­ble spot.

Majority Republican­s, haunted by the panel’s 1991 treatment of Anita Hill during Justice Clarence Thomas’ confirmati­on hearings, say the invitation to testify publicly on Monday stands.

Eleven Republican­s sit on the committee, opposite 10 Democrats.

Zero: That’s how many women sit among the panel’s Republican­s, who will cross-examine Ford. Republican­s said late Tuesday they were considerin­g hiring outside attorneys, presumably including women, to question the witnesses.

The six

Of the Senate women, six are Republican­s.

They are Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Deb Fischer of Nebraska, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississipp­i.

Only Fischer and HydeSmith are on the ballot this year.

Republican skeptics

A restrained Trump said Wednesday he wants to hear what Ford has to say.

“If she shows up and makes a credible showing that’ll be very interestin­g. We’ll have to make a decision,” he told reporters. But he added that Kavanaugh “is such an outstandin­g man. Very hard for me to imagine that anything happened.”

Some Republican­s pointed to the decades between the alleged attack and now.

“There are gaps in her memory,” the Senate’s No. 2 Republican, John Cornyn of Texas, said, referring to details Ford has said she can’t remember. “She doesn’t know how she got there, when it was and so that would logically be something where she would get questions.”

“Requiring an FBI investigat­ion of a 36-year-old allegation (without specific references to time or location) ... is not about finding the truth, but delaying the process until after the midterm elections,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a statement.

Democratic women

Standing up for a fair hearing should not just come down to women, said Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii.

“Guess who is perpetrati­ng all of these kinds of actions? It’s the men in this country,” Hirono said at a news conference Tuesday. “I just want to say to the men in this country: Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing, for a change.”

Wednesday on CNN, she described the Senate’s treatment of Ford as “callousnes­s from my colleagues that I am totally appalled by.”

“She hardly expected to be revictimiz­ed and retraumati­zed,” Hirono said.

Republican women

Ernst is a retired combat veteran who’s talked publicly about facing sexual harassment in the military during more than two decades of service, and she’s worked in the Senate to combat sex abuse. On Kavanaugh, she said Ford’s story is important.

“If she is accusing him of something so egregious, she needs to be heard,” Ernst told Radio Iowa on Tuesday.

Hyde-Smith questioned the timing of the revelation by Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California last week that Feinstein had known about the case for weeks and referred it to the FBI. Ford, initially reluctant to go public, did so after reporters got wind of it and started asking questions.

“I have serious reservatio­ns regarding the questionab­le timing and handling of this last-minute allegation,” Hyde-Smith said in a statement. “This process should go forward so both sides can be heard.”

Potential 2020 Democrats

The controvers­y hands Senate Democrats considerin­g challengin­g Trump in 2020 a rich opportunit­y, and they’re taking it.

New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand called the allegation “disqualify­ing” and said she believes Ford.

“To refuse to treat this properly and try to confirm Judge Kavanaugh at any cost tells women that once again they are not important and they are not to be believed,” Gillibrand said, adding, “that you are worth less than a man’s promotion.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachuse­tts posted a video on her Twitter feed of a speech Kavanaugh gave in 2015 in which he recalls his life with three friends at Georgetown Preparator­y School.

“What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep,” Kavanaugh said, describing the philosophy. “That’s been a good thing for all of us, I think.”

“I can’t imagine any parent accepting this view,” Warren tweeted Tuesday. “Is this really what America wants in its next Supreme Court Justice?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States