The Day

Is Lamont about change or not?

- The Journal Inquirer

Lamont is presenting himself as the candidate of both change and continuity. This is incoherent.

P ouring more of his personal wealth into his campaign for governor, zillionair­e Democrat Ned Lamont went on television the other day with a new commercial touting “change.” In the ad Lamont says he’ll cut property and small-business taxes, reduce medical costs, and demand equal pay for equal work for women.

The latter already has been the law for a long time but Democrats need to nurture resentment­s to rile up their tribal base. The other objectives proclaimed by Lamont’s new commercial will be delusional until state government manages to close the $4 billion deficit projected for the next state budget, and Lamont offers no ideas about that.

Indeed, while Lamont’s campaign distribute­s press releases every day, the projected budget deficit is so large that whoever is elected governor will be lucky just to keep the lights on at the state Capitol for his first few years in office. Any proposals that cost money will be mere posturing and pandering until the deficit is closed.

At the end of his new commercial Lamont declares, “Change starts now.” But even as the commercial began airing, Lamont received the endorsemen­t of another state employee union, that of the state police. The unions are not supporting Lamont in pursuit of change but rather in defense of their privileges under the political status quo. The unions are confident that, since they dominate the Democratic Party, which has controlled state government for eight years, as governor Lamont will go easier on them than any other candidate.

Meanwhile Lamont keeps charging that the election of the Republican candidate, Bob Stefanowsk­i, will destroy all public services, since the Republican’s only idea is to eliminate the state income tax and thus forgo half of state government’s revenue. In effect Lamont is arguing that no state and municipal government operations can manage with less money — that no employees, contractor­s, and welfare recipients can be directed to do more with less. That is, Lamont is arguing that the government and welfare classes must not be disturbed and that change is actually impossible.

So Lamont is presenting himself as the candidate of both change and continuity. This is incoherent. But it may be more than Stefanowsk­i offers.

For at least Lamont is making appearance­s around the state, issuing statements, and being accessible. As for Stefanowsk­i, other than his ads attacking Lamont as a clone of the ever-unpopular Governor Malloy, the Republican is hardly to be seen. The only advantage of this campaign strategy seems to be to prevent the candidate from displaying his unfamiliar­ity with state government and the state itself. After all, Stefanowsk­i never before has been involved with public life and didn’t even vote for the last 16 years.

Tax money pit

Next time New Haven Mayor Toni Harp shows up at the Capitol to plead poverty and to clamor for more state money for her city, legislator­s might ask her about her administra­tion’s concealmen­t of its travel expenses, as reported this week by the New Haven Independen­t.

Officials with city credit cards, the Independen­t found, have not disclosed to the Board of Alders their cross-country flights, hotel stays, and luxurious meals on city business. Trips to meetings of the U.S. Conference of Mayors have cost two or three times more than was reported.

Since state government reimburses half the city’s budget, New Haven seems to figure that it’s nobody’s money.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States