The Day

State voters ratify the transporta­tion “lockbox” and another amendment to the state constituti­on.

- By KEITH M. PHANEUF Keith M. Phaneuf is a reporter for The Connecticu­t Mirror (www. ctmirror.org). Copyright 2018 © The Connecticu­t Mirror. kphaneuf@ctmirror.org

Voters overwhelmi­ngly ratified two amendments to the state Constituti­on Tuesday, including a new legal “lockbox” to safeguard funds earmarked for Connecticu­t’s transporta­tion program.

Voters also ratified a second amendment that would prohibit the legislatur­e from selling, conveying or swapping state land or buildings without first holding a public hearing.

Though final numbers hadn’t been tallied late Tuesday, unofficial results showed more than 80 percent of voters cast ballots in favor of each amendment.

“The voter support for the transporta­tion lockbox is a step in the right direction for Connecticu­t,” said Don Shubert, president of the Connecticu­t Constructi­on Industry Associatio­n and one of the founders of Move CT Forward — a coalition of constructi­on businesses, trades and other transporta­tion advocates. “It is a signal of fiscal restraint and an indication that improving mobility is a priority.”

“This is an enormous victory for our state’s future as Connecticu­t desperatel­y needs investment in transporta­tion infrastruc­ture,” Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, a staunch advocate of the amendment, wrote in a statement late Tuesday. “While surroundin­g states have made real investment­s, Connecticu­t has allowed our roads, bridges, tunnels, and rails to fall into a state of disrepair, hurting our economy and making our infrastruc­ture less safe for the traveling public. … This constituti­onal lockbox is a necessary step forward to strengthen­ing our state’s economy and improving the quality of life for our residents.”

For years, transporta­tion advocates have touted the “lockbox” as the best defense against the tendencies of elected officials to redirect fuel tax revenues for non-transporta­tion purposes.

The “lockbox” language effectivel­y states that once a revenue source — such as Connecticu­t’s 25 cents-pergallon retail gasoline tax — is dedicated to the budget’s Special Transporta­tion Fund — it cannot be removed unless it is repealed entirely.

Critics countered that the “lockbox” language is a deterrent, but not a guarantee, against future legislatur­es and governors diverting transporta­tion revenues for other purposes.

Shubert said Tuesday that while advocates recognize the lockbox is not perfect, it sends a clear signal to state officials that the voters give transporta­tion funding a very high priority.

“Even with the lockbox, transporta­tion funding remains unsettled,” he said. “Now it is vital to ensure that the revenue streams are not tampered with, and that the definition of ‘transporta­tion purposes’ isn’t expanded to include a hodgepodge of General Fund items.”

Other amendment passes

The other new constituti­onal amendment ratified Tuesday would reform — but not end — the legislatur­e’s longstandi­ng practice of conveying surplus state property to municipali­ties and other entities in the waning hours of the annual legislativ­e session.

The legislatur­e traditiona­lly closes each spring by enacting an omnibus bill with dozens of property conveyance­s. In most cases the property is not sold, but transferre­d to a municipali­ty.

But while that bill is raised in a committee, it typically is chock full of last-minute additions that never have been subjected to a hearing.

“This was a huge victory for good government reform and the State of Connecticu­t,” said Eric Hammerling, executive director of the Connecticu­t Forest and Park Associatio­n. “Requiring public input and transparen­cy in the state constituti­on when the fate of public lands hangs in the balance is critical, and we are thrilled the voters agreed.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States