The Day

Acting attorney general has no plans to recuse himself

Sources say Sessions’ former chief of staff likely to oversee Mueller’s Russia probe

- By DEVLIN BARRETT, MATT ZAPOTOSKY and JOSH DAWSEY

Washington — Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker has no intention of recusing himself from overseeing the special counsel probe of Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election, according to people close to him who added they do not believe he would approve any subpoena of President Donald Trump as part of that investigat­ion.

Since stepping into his new role on Wednesday, Whitaker has faced questions — principall­y from Democrats — about whether he should recuse from the Russia investigat­ion, given that he has written opinion pieces in the past about the investigat­ion, and is a friend and political ally of a witness.

On Thursday, two people close to Whitaker said he has no intention of taking himself off the Russia case.

Ethics officials at the Justice Department are likely to review his past work to see if he has any financial or personal conflicts. In many instances, that office does not require a Justice Department official to recuse, but suggests a course of action. In the past, senior Justice Department officials tend to follow such advice, but they are rarely required to do so, according to officials familiar with the process.

A Justice Department spokeswoma­n declined to comment. Officials there have said Whitaker will follow the regular procedure in handling any ethics issues that arise.

In 2014, Whitaker chaired the campaign of Sam Clovis, a Republican candidate for Iowa state treasurer. Clovis went on to work as a Trump campaign adviser and has become a witness in the investigat­ion by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The Justice Department advises employees that “generally, an employee should seek advice from an ethics official before participat­ing in any matter in which her impartiali­ty could be questioned.” Regulation­s prohibit employees, “without written authorizat­ion, from participat­ing in a criminal investigat­ion or prosecutio­n if he has a personal or political relationsh­ip with any person or organiza-

tion substantia­lly involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigat­ion or prosecutio­n.”

Ethics officials might advise Whitaker that his commentary created the appearance of a conflict of interest and leave the decision to him. If they recommende­d forcefully that he recuse himself and he declined, Whitaker could then be referred to the Justice Department’s Office of Profession­al Responsibi­lity, and his license to practice law could be put at issue.

The two people close to Whitaker also said they strongly believe he would not approve any request from special counsel Robert Mueller to subpoena the president. Mueller and Trump’s lawyers have negotiated for months about a possible interview, with no agreement in sight.

Whitaker’s elevation to become the nation’s top law enforcemen­t official followed the ouster Wednesday of Jeff Sessions as attorney general. Sessions had endured months of public abuse from Trump, who soured on Sessions because he recused himself from oversight of the Russia investigat­ion shortly after he arrived at the Justice Department.

Sessions felt that Mueller’s investigat­ion had gone on too long, but also believed it was important that he stay in the attorney general job as a means of protecting the special counsel’s work so that, when it was concluded, the public would have confidence it had not been manipulate­d, according to a person familiar with his thinking.

Even after he arrived at the Justice Department, Whitaker harbored frustratio­n about the length of the special counsel probe and doubts about the scope of Mueller’s authority, a person familiar with the matter said. He questioned Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s ability to give Mueller such wide latitude and wanted to explore the bounds of what Mueller was examining, though Rosenstein kept Session’s office “walled off” from the matter, this person said. Whitaker did, however, believe that Sessions had no choice but to recuse himself from the matter, the person said.

Rosenstein and Whitaker have come to eye each other warily in recent months, people familiar with the matter said. When Rosenstein was nearly ousted from his post over reports that he had suggested surreptiti­ously recording the president, Whitaker was tapped to take over Rosenstein’s position. But after a visit to the White House, Rosenstein returned and stayed in his job, leaving people across the Justice Department — Whitaker included — mystified as to what happened, these people said.

Rosenstein and Whitaker both were present at the investitur­e of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday — Whitaker dressed in a “morning suit,” which included formal trousers, a vest and a long coat, a person familiar with the matter said.

While Whitaker is now Mueller’s ultimate supervisor, it was not immediatel­y clear whether that meant Rosenstein would step aside. Justice Department officials said that under normal circumstan­ces, the deputy attorney general would likely play an active, hands-on role in overseeing such a high profile probe, and they had no reason to believe that Rosenstein would now be cut out.

Whitaker was virtually unknown to Sessions before becoming his chief of staff, though Federalist Society Executive President Leonard Leo had been touting the former U.S. attorney from Iowa as early as the transition, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Whitaker was a hardchargi­ng top aide to Sessions, imposing on the Justice Department his personal philosophy of starting with the end in mind. His style rubbed many the wrong way, and at times Justice Department officials pushed back on his demands. Department officials said his taking over for his boss was, at the very least, awkward, because chiefs of staff typically leave with the attorney general.

On Wednesday evening, Sessions gathered dozens of top Justice Department officials in the attorney general’s conference room, according to a person familiar with the matter. He talked about loving the job and framed his removal as something that happens to every attorney general, the person said. He also said he thought Whitaker would carry the torch, the person said.

In a note sent to the Justice Department staff on Thursday, Sessions wrote, “No matter what your role at the Department and no matter what your task, I hope that you will remember that you are helping us in our mission to protect the American people and the rights we hold dear.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States