The Day

TRUMP DOESN’T ‘BELIEVE’ CLIMATE CHANGE REPORT

President casts doubt on conclusion­s of his own administra­tion

- By SETH BORENSTEIN and ZEKE MILLER

President Donald Trump on Monday rejected an alarming scientific report issued by his own administra­tion that concludes climate change will have disastrous effects on the U.S. economy unless world leaders commit to combating the planet-warming phenomenon.

Speaking to reporters at the White House before departing for political rallies in Mississipp­i, Trump said the National Climate Assessment was generally “fine.” But, when pressed on the 1,656-page report’s economic findings, Trump demurred.

The scientific assessment lays out in devastatin­g detail how the gradual warming of the planet as a result of human activity directly correlates with the uptick in natural disasters seen across the U.S. See A2

Washington — President Donald Trump on Monday rejected a central conclusion of a dire report on the economic costs of climate change released by his own administra­tion.

But economists said the National Climate Assessment’s warning of hundreds of billions of dollars a year in global warming costs is pretty much on the money.

Just look at last year with Hurricanes Harvey, Maria and Irma, they said. Those three 2017 storms caused at least $265 billion in damage, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion.

The climate report , quietly unveiled Friday, warned that natural disasters are worsening in the United States because of global warming.

It said warming-charged extremes “have already become more frequent, intense, widespread or of long duration.” The report noted the last few years have smashed U.S. records for damaging weather, costing nearly $400 billion since 2015.

“The potential for losses in some sectors could reach hundreds of billions of dollars per year by the end of this century,” the report said. It added that if emissions of heat-trapping gases continue at current levels, labor costs in outdoor industries during heat waves could cost $155 billion in lost wages per year by 2090.

The president said he read some of the report “and it’s fine” but not the part about the devastatin­g economic impact.

“I don’t believe it,” Trump said, adding that if “every other place on Earth is dirty, that’s not so good.”

Nearly every country in the world in 2015 pledged to reduce or slow the growth of carbon dioxide emissions, the chief greenhouse gas.

“We’re already there,” said Wesleyan University economist Gary Yohe, who was a reviewer of the national report, which was produced by 13 federal agencies and outside scientists. “Climate change is making a noticeable impact on our economy right now: Harvey, Florence, Michael, Maria.”

Yohe said, “It is devastatin­g at particular locations, but for the entire country? No.”

Economist Ray Kopp, a vice president at the think tank Resources For the Future and who wasn’t part of the assessment, said the economics and the science in the report were absolutely credible.

“I believe this is going to be a devastatin­g loss without any other action-taking place,” Kopp said Monday. “This is certainly something you would want to avoid.”

Earlier, the White House had played down the report. Spokeswoma­n Lindsay Walters said in an emailed statement that the report “is largely based on the most extreme scenario, which contradict­s long-establishe­d trends by assuming that, despite strong economic growth that would increase greenhouse gas emissions, there would be limited technology and innovation, and a rapidly expanding population.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States