The Day

It is time to shut down tax havens

- By MICHAEL GALANT

F or many Americans, February is tax time — or at least the time they are reminded of their need to pay taxes, now that the forms are all in. That means millions of people are starting to sift through piles of paper hoping they won’t owe more than they can afford.

Meanwhile, for a certain segment of the population, this concern is greatly lessened by the strategic use of tax havens.

“Freeports” — special locations where the world’s richest can hoard their valuables tax free — are increasing­ly common. These include a high-security warehouse in Switzerlan­d’s capital city of Geneva that brims with the treasure of the global elite: gold, jewelry, diamonds, the finest French wines, priceless historical artifacts, and irreplacea­ble renaissanc­e paintings (many stolen).

But freeports are just one manifestat­ion of a larger shadow financial system built for the few on the backs of the many. Other tax havens are jurisdicti­ons where tax rates are low and financial systems opaque. These include such well-known havens as Switzerlan­d and the Cayman Islands, but also others closer to home, in Delaware, Nevada and Wyoming.

Corporatio­ns and the 1 percent exploit these havens, using legal loopholes and accounting sleight-ofhand to avoid paying their fair share.

Gabriel Zucman, a University of California economics professor, estimated in 2017 that the United States loses close to $70 billion annually in corporate tax revenue due to tax havens, an amount equal to nearly 20 percent of the total corporate tax revenue collected each year.

Each dollar lost is a dollar that can’t be spent on health care, education, or combating climate change. While teachers must strike for livable wages and politician­s claim we just don’t have the money for single-payer health care, these billions are not being collected.

Much of this money finds its way into the political process. In less than two years, seven-hedge fund leaders, all regular tax haven users, gave more $60 million in political contributi­ons, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Apple, the tax avoidance poster child, publicly refused to repatriate its haven-held funds until the corporate tax rate was cut. With the Trump administra­tion’s signature tax plan, the company got its wish, allowing it to bring back $252 billion in cash that it held abroad.

The harm is not limited to America. According to Zucman, the ultrawealt­hy hold $8.7 trillion, almost 11.5 percent of total world GDP, in tax havens. Every year, developing countries lose to illicit financial flows. It doesn’t have to be this way. Beneficial ownership laws, like the one recently passed in the United Kingdom, require corporatio­ns to stop hiding behind accounting trickery and make their ownership public. Country-by-country reporting requires transnatio­nal corporatio­ns to declare where their profits are made (and where they should be taxed). Automatic informatio­n exchange agreements obligate countries to share financial informatio­n so that profits can’t be secretivel­y shifted. And a World Financial Registry would systematiz­e this informatio­n sharing, rendering tax evasion next to impossible.

Ending tax havens won’t bring about a political system free of corporate influence. But it’s a necessary step.

Michael Galant is a graduate of the master of public policy program at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. This column was produced for the Progressiv­e Media Project.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States