The Day

Mueller circus leaves town

But Democrats won’t accept that the show is over

- By DAVID WINSTON

Well, the three-ring partisan circus also known as the Mueller hearings is over. The hours of testimony, and the hundreds of hours of media and political commentary leading up to the highly anticipate­d grilling, are in the history books. The days of analysis, most based on little but educated guesses, are thankfully in the rearview mirror.

At little more than a week later, the dust has settled and the political class has rendered their verdicts. Democrats declared victory. Many in the media, surprising­ly, called it a disaster, while Republican­s said it was time to move on. What we haven’t heard much about is what the American people thought of U.S. Reps. Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff’s latest attempt to use their committees to back up their claims of collusion and obstructio­n by the Trump campaign.

In a Winning the Issues survey done July 27-28, after the hearings, we tested voter interest and assessment of the Mueller appearance before Congress. Voters’ partisan affiliatio­n played a role in both their interest and how they assessed the testimony. Almost half of all voters (49 percent) said they saw some of the congressio­nal hearings and the testimony of the former special counsel. Fifty-five percent of Republican­s and 53 percent of Democrats said they watched.

Those may seem like high numbers, and they are. But in all likelihood, this high degree of interest reflects the widespread post-hearing media coverage, which focused on clips showing Mueller’s interactio­n with committee members from both sides. While most people didn’t sit down and watch more than six hours of testimony, it would have been nearly impossible for anyone tuning into a cable channel or getting a social media fix to avoid seeing the partisan back-and-forth that characteri­zed the hearings.

The partisan nature of the hearings may also explain why a smaller

number of independen­ts — 37 percent — and moderate independen­ts — 25 percent — said they saw the hearing.

Mueller was a flop

Despite the Democrats’ best effort to bolster the credibilit­y of their key witness, Mueller and his shockingly weak performanc­e didn’t fare well with voters in their assessment. Thirty-eight percent viewed him favorably, while 40 percent viewed him unfavorabl­y. Digging a little deeper into the numbers with voters who will play key roles in the 2020 election, the survey found independen­ts weren’t impressed (34 percent favorable, 42 percent unfavorabl­e). Neither were suburban women (37 percent favorable, 41 percent unfavorabl­e).

Democrats need those voters to win in 2020.

What people told us they heard from Democrats last week may explain their lack of enthusiasm. A combinatio­n of “allegation­s of Donald Trump’s ties to Russia,” “Mueller report and congressio­nal hearings” and “discussion­s about impeachmen­t of the president” accounted for 43 percent of what voters said they took away from the Democrats.

Did it work for them?

Overall, voters reacted more negatively than favorably, at 37 percent more favorable and 45 percent less favorable to Democrats in Congress based on what they heard. Unsurprisi­ngly, Republican­s had a lopsided view, at 14 percent favorable and 78 percent unfavorabl­e. So did Democrats, coming in at 67 percent favorable and 14 percent unfavorabl­e.

But what should worry Democrats is the reaction from independen­ts (22 percent favorable, 48 percent unfavorabl­e), moderate independen­ts (19 percent favorable, 43 percent unfavorabl­e) and suburban women (33 percent favorable, 41 percent unfavorabl­e). Of the people who identified the three Democratic messages I mentioned earlier, the results were even more alarming for the Nadler and Schiff performanc­e, at 27 percent favorable and 59 percent unfavorabl­e.

Voters turned off

Both the political and ideologica­l centers responded negatively to what they heard from the hearings. The data clearly shows it wasn’t just Republican­s or center-right independen­ts who took a dim view of the Democrats’ strategic messaging. Moderate independen­ts told us they weren’t thrilled either.

The survey data also raises the question of whether the Democrats’ decision to put all their eggs in the Mueller basket came at the expense of kitchen table issues. When we asked voters to rank 22 news stories on their importance in terms of their congressio­nal vote, the Mueller report and congressio­nal hearing came in 19th, with the economy and jobs at the top of the list.

Nor does it seem the hearings helped the Democrats’ satisfacti­on rankings with voters overall. Only 36 percent of voters said they were satisfied with the Democratic majority in the House, while 52 percent said they were not satisfied. As you would expect, Republican­s were at one end of the spectrum (20 percent satisfied, 73 percent dissatisfi­ed), and Democrats were at the other (60 percent satisfied, 25 percent dissatisfi­ed).

But the really concerning news for Democrats is the fact that independen­ts (22 percent satisfied, 63 percent dissatisfi­ed) were at almost the same level as Republican­s, with moderate independen­ts slightly worse (21 percent satisfied, 63 percent dissatisfi­ed).

The survey also found a split within the Democratic Party itself, as 68 percent of liberal Democrats said they are satisfied with their party’s House majority, while 49 percent (less than half) of moderate Democrats said they are satisfied.

Yet in the aftermath, Nadler and Schiff continue to claim victory when even their most ardent supporters, especially those in the media, have been highly critical of the hearings.

Former Obama operative David Axelrod tweeted that the hearings were “very, very painful,” while Harvard professor and Democratic activist Laurence Tribe called them a “disaster.” So did MSNBC’s Brian Williams. When it came to optics, NBC’s Chuck Todd called them a “failure.”

With the Mueller hearings a dud, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who understand­s the risks for her party in a divisive and likely unsuccessf­ul impeachmen­t, has clearly decided to slow-walk the drive for impeachmen­t. But as the number of Democratic House members favoring impeachmen­t continues to climb, with some Democratic senators hopping on board the impeachmen­t train this past week, whether she can keep her caucus from what is likely to be another disaster remains to be seen.

Before any more Democrats join their colleagues to embrace impeachmen­t, they might ask themselves a question. Did the Mueller hearings change the political calculus at all? A Quinnipiac poll (July 25-28) released last week found that voters, when asked whether Congress should begin the process to impeach Trump, opposed impeachmen­t, 60 percent to 32 percent. A month earlier, their June 12 survey found opposition to impeachmen­t at 61 percent to 33 percent.

If there’s anything to be learned from the Mueller hearings (and there isn’t much), it’s this: If you’re going to put on a circus, you better have a net.

David Winston is the president of The Winston Group and a longtime adviser to congressio­nal Republican­s. He served as the director of planning for Speaker Newt Gingrich. He advises Fortune 100 companies, foundation­s, and nonprofit organizati­ons on strategic planning and public policy issues, and is an election analyst for CBS News.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States