The Day

Report: Superinten­dent mishandled possible cuts

R.I. investigat­ion showed Stringfell­ow failed to follow procedures, but Norwich board unfazed

- By CLAIRE BESSETTE Day Staff Writer

An independen­t investigat­ion ordered by the South Kingstown, R.I., School Committee found that now-Norwich Superinten­dent Kristen Stringfell­ow failed to follow proper procedures in issuing dozens of potential layoff and re-assignment notices connected with budget cuts in April, four days before she was named to the Norwich post.

Stringfell­ow sent out the notificati­on letters April 19, just days before she unanimousl­y was approved as the new Norwich superinten­dent on April 23, her term to start July 1. In response to complaints about how the notices were handled, the School Committee placed Stringfell­ow on paid administra­tive leave on April 26 and hired Providence attorney Charles A. Ruggerio to investigat­e the complaints. Stringfell­ow remained on paid leave in South Kingstown until she started her Norwich position officially on July 1.

Report released Tuesday

The South Kingstown School Committee reviewed Ruggerio's 28-page report at its meeting Tuesday and voted to release the report to the public.

Ruggerio concluded that Stringfell­ow failed to follow the proper procedure for handling personnel decisions, and her failure to meet with teachers prior to sending notices of

involuntar­y transfers and provide them with reasons for the transfers was a violation of the collective bargaining agreement. Stringfell­ow also failed to notify the school committee prior to sending the April 19 notices, despite frequent communicat­ion with Chairwoman Stephanie Canter on other issues.

“In summary, it is clear that Stringfell­ow was aware of the establishe­d process for handling personnel decisions and failed to adhere to them, creating unnecessar­y issues for both the School Department and the affected teachers,” Ruggerio concluded. “This failure, in the least, amounted to negligence perhaps because she was engaged in the process of

transition­ing to her new position outside the School Department. There is no evidence that any School Committee member was aware of the deficienci­es or Stringfell­ow’s notices prior to the time they were issued, and thus, there was no way for the Committee to have avoided the problem.”

Reached by phone Wednesday, Canter said the committee took no action on the report Tuesday, other than to release it after redacting numerous attachment­s that identified specific teachers involved in the notices that subsequent­ly were rescinded.

“We didn’t discuss it,” Canter said. “I think probably the feeling in the committee and the community is to just move on.”

‘Followed all ... policies’

Stringfell­ow said Wednesday she had not received or read the full report. She is out of the office due to a family emergency this week. In a brief email response to questions, she said she will read the full report and issue comments at that time.

“I believe I followed all school board policies and RI laws (as I have done successful­ly since 2009),” she wrote in the email. “I did not lay-off or terminate any employees. I simply gave teachers appropriat­e notice, in accordance with RI Open Meeting laws, that the School Board would be discussing them in an executive session of the School Board.”

Norwich Board of Education Chairwoman Yvette Jacaruso said the Norwich board was aware of the general controvers­y in South Kingstown but not specifics of the complaints about notificati­ons to teachers about possible layoffs or transfers. Jacaruso said the investigat­ion report will have no bearing on the decision to hire Stringfell­ow and that the Norwich board is very pleased with her initial month in the position.

“For what we can tell, in the four weeks she’s been with us, she’s done an outstandin­g job in meeting with everyone in city government, teachers, administra­tors and parents,” Jacaruso said. “She’s gone above and beyond making herself known that she wants to work collaborat­ively with everyone involved. She’s met with union leaders. She’s been very cooperativ­e and open about it.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States