The Day

Whistleblo­wer makes offer to GOP

Individual willing to answer written questions from House Republican­s

- By JACQUELINE ALEMANY, PAUL KANE and FELICIA SONMEZ

An attorney for the whistleblo­wer who filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s apparent efforts to pressure Ukraine for informatio­n he could use against political rivals said Sunday that Republican­s on the House Intelligen­ce Committee could submit questions directly to his client instead of going through the panel’s Democratic majority.

Mark Zaid confirmed his client’s offer to the top Republican on the Intelligen­ce Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, to answer written questions under oath and with penalty of perjury, while also protecting the individual’s identity. In recent days, Trump and his allies have ramped up efforts to expose the whistleblo­wer’s identity, amplifying theories regarding the person’s motives.

Questions “cannot seek identifyin­g info, regarding which we will not provide, or otherwise be inappropri­ate,”

Zaid tweeted, adding that the offer reflects his client’s desire to be seen as nonpartisa­n. “We stand ready to cooperate and ensure facts — rather than partisansh­ip — dictates any process involving the #whistleblo­wer.”

The whistleblo­wer’s attorneys previously notified both the House and Senate intelligen­ce committees that their client was willing to respond to questions in writing and under oath “in a bipartisan manner.” By offering a direct channel to Republican­s, the whistleblo­wer’s team has sought to quell grumbling by GOP leadership — and the president — that the impeachmen­t process has been secretive and unfair.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., appearing on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” which first reported about the offer for the written testimony, rejected that as insufficie­nt for such a critical moment as impeaching a president.

“I think that the whistleblo­wer should come forward in an open hearing,” McCarthy said, suggesting that the whistleblo­wer should also identify the White House officials whom he cited in his complaint as criticizin­g Trump’s actions. “He needs to answer the questions, we need an openness that people understand this.”

McCarthy again raised a GOP talking point, saying that the impeachmen­t process is flawed, even though Republican­s’ previous objections — that the inquiry had not been formally voted on — were dealt with Thursday with a vote to set up formal impeachmen­t procedures.

“There’s no transparen­cy,” said McCarthy, who spent Saturday night with Trump at New York’s Madison Square Garden for a mixed-martial arts fight.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., mocked McCarthy’s complaints, saying that the GOP leader had neither the facts nor the law on his side and so was just “pounding the table.”

Nunes’ office did not respond to a request for comment, and it remains unclear whether Republican­s have accepted the whistleblo­wer’s offer.

Democrats, who initially considered the whistleblo­wer central to their investigat­ion, now see no need for the individual’s testimony, citing ample evidence from senior administra­tion officials that support the whistleblo­wer’s claims. Nearly a dozen witnesses, in addition to the call notes released by the White House of the July 25 phone conversati­on between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, have corroborat­ed the whistleblo­wer’s complaint. Several officials have testified that they expressed concerns to the National Security Council’s attorneys that the call was inappropri­ate, despite Trump’s claims otherwise.

Trump maintained Sunday that the whistleblo­wer “should be revealed,” insisting to reporters that his phone call with Zelensky was “totally appropriat­e.”

“I think that the whistleblo­wer should come forward in an open hearing. He needs to answer the questions, we need an openness that people understand this.”

HOUSE MINORITY LEADER KEVIN MCCARTHY, R-CALIF.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States