The Day

FAA analysis predicted many more Max crashes without a fix

- By DAVID KOENIG AP Airlines Writer

After the first crash of a Boeing 737 Max last year, federal safety officials estimated that there could be 15 more fatal crashes of the Max over the next few decades if Boeing didn't fix a critical automated flight-control system.

Yet the Federal Aviation Administra­tion did not ground the plane until a second deadly crash five months later.

The FAA analysis was disclosed Wednesday during a hearing of the House Transporta­tion Committee, which is investigat­ing the FAA's oversight of Boeing and the Max.

“Despite its own calculatio­ns, the FAA rolled the dice on the safety of the traveling public and let the Max continue to fly until Boeing could overhaul its MCAS software,” said Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., chairman of the committee.

MCAS is the name of Boeing's flight-control system that automatica­lly pushed the noses of the doomed planes down in response to faulty readings from a sensor.

FAA Administra­tor Stephen Dickson declined to call the agency's decision not to immediatel­y ground the plane a mistake. Instead, the FAA and Boeing issued notices reminding pilots how to handle a nosedown pitch of their plane.

“Obviously the result is not satisfacto­ry,” Dickson said. “The decision did not achieve the result that it needed to achieve.”

The FAA concluded that more than 2,900 people could die in Max crashes over 45 years without the software fix. It assumed the fleet would eventually grow to 4,800 planes. Fewer than 400 were flying before they were grounded in March, after the second crash. And it estimated Boeing could fix MCAS software in about seven months.

The analysis was completed several weeks after the FAA had already issued the emergency notice to pilots — the agency took no additional steps after estimating 15 future crashes.

An FAA spokesman said the analysis is one of several tools the agency uses to analyze safety issues.

A Boeing spokesman said the company's response to the first crash was “fully consistent with the FAA's analysis and establishe­d process.”

Dickson said that as Boeing seeks to return the Max to flying, his agency is controllin­g the process and won't delegate any of that authority to Boeing.

Dickson defended the safety record of U.S. aviation while saying “what we have done in the past and what we are doing now will not be good enough in the future.”

A retired Boeing production manager told the lawmakers about “alarming” conditions at Boeing's 737 factory in Renton, Washington, where two Max planes that crashed were built.

The manager, Edward Pierson, said the assembly line fell far behind schedule by mid2018 because of cascading problems that began with late delivery of key parts. There weren't enough mechanics and other workers, he said. Yet Boeing went ahead with its plan to boost production from 47 to 52 planes a month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States