The Day

20/20 vision

Being clear-sighted about climate change in 2020

- By JUDY BENSON Judy Benson is the communicat­ions coordinato­r at Connecticu­t Sea Grant, a partnershi­p of the University of Connecticu­t and the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Associatio­n that is one of 34 Sea Grant programs nationwide. She can be reached

Already coastal roads from Greenwich to Stonington are experienci­ng “sunny day flooding” at high tides, storm drains are overwhelme­d with frequent heavy rains, and warming waters in Long Island Sound are reordering the marine ecosystem.

Homonyms spawn countless puns and some of the most amusing turns of phrase in modern culture. Think of Baloo the bear singing “Bare Necessitie­s” in the Disney version of “Jungle Book.”

Now though, the New Year presents an opportunit­y to consider a homonym as a motivating message. Just as the number “20/20” is the measure of optimal vision, the year 2020 can be about setting an intention for keeping clear sighted about what climate change means now and in the future, and how best to respond. One of my Sea Grant colleagues in Alaska said recently that residents there don’t have to be convinced of the reality of climate change, because melting permafrost, flooding coastal villages and altered fisheries there are everyday realities. They are readily engaging in projects to adapt. Neither can we in Connecticu­t afford the luxury of willful blindness.

Already coastal roads from Greenwich to Stonington are experienci­ng “sunny day flooding” at high tides, storm drains are overwhelme­d with frequent heavy rains, and warming waters in Long Island Sound are reordering the marine ecosystem. This March, municipal officials from around the state will gather for the seventh climate adaptation workshop co-sponsored by Connecticu­t Sea Grant in as many years. This time, the topic — requested by previous attendees — will be shoreline retreat. It’s a highly sensitive but necessary conversati­on for the many cities and towns with shoreline neighborho­ods increasing­ly vulnerable to rising seas and intensifyi­ng storms. Figuring out if, where and how to structure fair and orderly buy-out programs is one of the many daunting challenges that’s better to face now than after the next natural disaster.

Managing shoreline retreat is just one of the many climate change conundrums involving the intersecti­on of the coastal economy with the environmen­t. Decades of fossil fuel emissions are changing the chemistry of the atmosphere, the ocean and the land, setting off a cascade of impacts moving with momentum that can’t be stopped immediatel­y, and not ever without confrontin­g the truth. One of those truths is accepting what we don’t know, and working to understand it.

That’s the case with the acidificat­ion of our coastal areas. It’s the more complicate­d cousin of the better known phenomenon of ocean acidificat­ion turning offshore waters into hostile environmen­ts for coral reef survival, among other effects. But the changes there are following a more predicable path.

Not so in coastal areas like the Long Island Sound estuary. Variable inputs of freshwater from rivers, nutrients and pollution from land and warming temperatur­es are combining with increasing carbon dioxide levels to change local water chemistry in erratic ways that threaten coastal economies. In some areas elsewhere in the North Atlantic region, commercial shellfish farmers are adding buffering agents to the seawater in their hatcheries where young shellfish are grown. Without it, the larvae can’t develop their shells properly.

But the exact combinatio­ns of mechanisms causing this to happen in one area and not in another as little as 10 miles away remains unknown. Nor can we predict where it will happen next. Connecticu­t Sea Grant, working with the New England Coastal Acidificat­ion Network, has been working to further the science and will be communicat­ing findings to industry, policymake­rs and the public in 2020, a continuati­on of work begun in 2018.

But working on the hard problems of climate change isn’t just for the scientists and their colleagues in groups like Sea Grant. Consider the words of the Rev. Margaret Bullitt-Jonas, who shared the panel

with Connecticu­t Sea Grant’s Juliana Barrett and others at a forum last October titled, “Reality, Hope and Action in an Age of Climate Change” at St. James Episcopal Church in New London. In her recent book of Advent readings, she writes, “However we participat­e in healing creation, all of us are needed. Everyone has a part to play.”

Consider, too, the words of the wonderful writer Wendell Berry. In an essay about a sustainabl­y managed Pennsylvan­ia forest as metaphor for the kind of reordering needed in our collective and individual relationsh­ips with our home planet, he writes: “To say that the good care of the forest, as of all the world’s places, depends upon love is, sure enough, to define a difficulty. But not an impossibil­ity. The impossibil­ity is that humans would ever take good care of anything that they don’t love. And we can take courage from the knowledge that millions of Americans once loved their vegetable gardens, cared well for them, and kept them dependably productive — and that a good many still do.”

With love, clear vision and resolve to play our part, 2020 can be a better year for us and the Earth.

 ?? DANA JENSEN/THE DAY ?? Flooding leaves streets in the Lords Point section of Stonington flooded in this 2011 photo.
DANA JENSEN/THE DAY Flooding leaves streets in the Lords Point section of Stonington flooded in this 2011 photo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States