The Day

A split verdict in Trump impeachmen­t trial

-

I f Senate Republican­s ignore their duty and the will of the American people and block the calling of any witnesses in the impeachmen­t trial of President Donald Trump, a vote on whether to convict and remove the president from office could come as soon as today.

And while the outcome seems predestine­d, with party-line or near party-line votes assuring the threshold of a two-thirds vote for conviction­s are not reached, the votes by the senators remain of immense importance and will be etched into history.

Representi­ng the people of Connecticu­t in these verdicts will be Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, both Democrats.

Obstructio­n of Congress

Trump’s across-the-board defiance of the House of Representa­tives in its impeachmen­t investigat­ion showed arrogant disregard for Congress’ constituti­onal responsibi­lity to act as a check on the power of the executive branch. It was indicative of Trump’s totalitari­an tendencies.

In his pronouncem­ents and those of his legal counsel, the president vowed his administra­tion would not cooperate in any way, neither producing documents nor providing witnesses.

Those executive branch members who testified did so out of a sense of patriotic duty and in defiance of the president’s wishes.

Confronted with this presidenti­al defiance, the House had valid grounds for sending the Obstructio­n of Congress article of impeachmen­t to the Senate.

At trial, however, attorneys for the president have provided legal grounds for opposing the House subpoenas, as thin as many of those arguments may be.

In their trial memorandum, the president’s lawyers raise legitimate concerns about the potential for the House to “turn any disagreeme­nt with the Executive over informatio­nal demands into a purported basis for removing the President from office.”

In other words, when it comes to the production of documents and witnesses, if the House says jump, and the president does not respond, “How high?”, can that be grounds for removal from office?

A missed step was an appeal to the courts to enforce the subpoenas. We believe the courts would have required President Trump to provide to the House most of the witnesses and documents it sought. That this process would have been time consuming, delaying the hearings well into a presidenti­al election year, was not grounds for skirting the judicial branch’s role as the arbiter in such disputes.

Had the courts ordered compliance and the president still refused, that would have been not only obstructio­n of Congress but, more fundamenta­lly, obstructio­n of justice and reason for conviction and removal from office. But those are not the facts in this instance.

Senators Blumenthal and Murphy should vote to acquit on Obstructio­n of Congress.

Abuse of Power

The far greater threat to the nation is the allegation­s against President Trump contained in the Abuse of Power article. It is beyond the reach of the courts to serve as a check on this abuse. It is up to the Senate. It is the kind of executive malfeasanc­e the founders envisioned in providing a mechanism of impeachmen­t and removal.

Despite the refusal of the administra­tion to cooperate in the House investigat­ion and the probable refusal of the Republican majority in the Senate to hear witnesses, the essential facts about Trump’s misconduct have been revealed and they are damning.

For weeks, at the president’s instructio­n and without legal justificat­ion, the administra­tion blocked $391 million in military assistance to Ukraine as a means of pressuring Ukraine’s leaders to announce an embarrassi­ng investigat­ion into Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President Joe Biden, focusing on the younger Biden’s service on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company.

The political motivation was obvious and can be dismissed only by willful ignorance, of which there appears to be plenty among Senate Republican­s. If Trump could strongarm Ukraine into casting aspersions on Joe Biden he would have damaged the candidacy of a potential Democratic presidenti­al candidate — arguably his strongest opponent — and improved his own chance for re-election.

This behavior strikes at the foundation of our Republic — self-rule. It is an invitation for other countries to curry favor — or avoid falling in disfavor — with this and future presidents by finding or manufactur­ing dirt on political opponents or otherwise helping the president politicall­y.

If this behavior becomes acceptable, it would leave our leaders beholden to foreign powers.

Acquitting President Trump of this article of impeachmen­t, we fear, will embolden him to again abuse the power of his office for political self-preservati­on. Senators Blumenthal and Murphy must send what message they can by voting to convict and remove the president for Abuse of Power.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States