The Day

This pandemic may be the first of many

- Nick R. Smith is an assistant professor of architectu­re and urban studies at Barnard College, Columbia University, and the author of the forthcomin­g book “The End of the Village: Planning the Urbanizati­on of Rural China.”

The recent report from the World Health Organizati­on on the origins of the coronaviru­s pandemic is largely inconclusi­ve. The truth is, we may never get clear answers to what brought us COVID-19. Neverthele­ss, there’s a lot to learn from the report, and though the authors prudently avoid definite conclusion­s, there is one thing we now know for sure: The speed and scale of Chinese urbanizati­on played an important role in the pandemic. And the country’s continuing push for rapid urbanizati­on makes another pandemic more likely.

The WHO report identifies three possible pathways for the origin of the pandemic, all of which can be traced back to bats or an alternativ­e, as-yet-unidentifi­ed “Animal X.” In order of probabilit­y, these pathways were: transmissi­on to humans via an intermedia­te animal host (such as livestock); transmissi­on directly to humans; or transmissi­on via contaminat­ion of the food supply chain (also known as the “cold chain”).

What the report doesn’t say is that each of these mechanisms is intimately linked to China’s rapid urbanizati­on and the resulting transforma­tion of the nation’s food systems. This relationsh­ip is not limited to China. As urbanizati­on expands worldwide and the space for wildlife shrinks, human environmen­t interactio­ns intensify, and zoonotic transmissi­on of viruses from animals to humans becomes easier.

China’s state-led push isn’t just about building megacities like Wuhan, a sprawling metropolis of more than 11 million people and the epicenter of the early pandemic. More importantl­y, it is about transformi­ng the nation’s vast countrysid­e. Since the early 2000s, China’s leaders have taken a deliberate approach to rural developmen­t, including a raft of policies that have sought to integrate rural areas more tightly into urbanizati­on. These initiative­s include plans to permanentl­y resettle hundreds of millions of rural people to towns and cities, where they will help drive growth in consumer demand — including for meat and other specialize­d foods.

The villages they leave behind are being transforme­d from communitie­s of subsistenc­e farming households into industrial­ized farms integrated into regional, national and internatio­nal food networks. These and other transforma­tions promise real improvemen­ts for a large portion of China’s population, but this policy of rural urbanizati­on also entails hidden costs, including increased risk of zoonotic epidemics.

Take, for instance, the pathway the WHO report deemed the most likely origin of the pandemic: transmissi­on via an intermedia­te animal host. In this scenario, the SARS-CoV-2 virus first circulated in bats, then spread to another animal species, then from that animal to humans. As the report makes clear, the likelihood of animal-to-animal transmissi­ons increases in the context of high-density, industrial­ized farming of livestock and wildlife, which has become more prevalent in China. Its industrial­ized pork and chicken production is an important source of emergent avian and swine flus, and one of the underrepor­ted stories of 2020 was the identifica­tion of a new strain of swine flu in China that has pandemic potential.

Urbanizati­on also plays a role in the second pathway identified by the WHO: direct transmissi­on from a bat to a human. This is partly because the rising affluence associated with urbanizati­on leads to greater demand for wildlife, the consumptio­n of which can sometimes serve as a status symbol in Chinese culture (exotic species are also used in traditiona­l Chinese medicine). While China’s government banned the wildlife trade in the wake of the pandemic, much of this sector operates illicitly, and some rural people have become dependent on the sale of exotic species for their livelihood­s.

This leads to the third potential pathway identified in the WHO report: contaminat­ion in the “cold chain.” Under this mechanism, which the WHO has labeled “possible” but not likely, the SARS-CoV-2 virus could have originated elsewhere and then been imported via contaminat­ed frozen food to Wuhan, where it seeded the pandemic. The rapid expansion of Chinese urbanizati­on also plays a role here.

The constructi­on of China’s frozen food infrastruc­ture has integrated markets that were once primarily local into sprawling regional, national and internatio­nal networks that allow the rapid transmissi­on of pathogens from one part of the world to another.

Many of the urban changes in China’s food systems are being replicated in and connected to other parts of the world through the Belt and Road Initiative, including, prominentl­y, Southeast Asia, which the WHO report repeatedly mentions as a potential alternativ­e origin point for SARS-CoV-2.

The dangers produced by the industrial­ization, specializa­tion and integratio­n of agricultur­e are not unique to China. The world’s increasing urbanizati­on and the resulting transforma­tion of its food systems mean that pandemics could arise anywhere, anytime.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States