The Day

Reliance Health employee questions agency CEO’s commitment to vaccine

Claims bias reflected in COVID-19 messaging and ‘enthusiasm’

- By BRIAN HALLENBECK

Norwich — A Reliance Health employee has questioned the chief executive officer’s commitment to COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns among the mental health agency’s staff, pointing to the CEO’s public opposition to legislativ­e proposals that would end the religious exemption for childhood vaccinatio­ns.

In an internal grievance, Philip Brose, who directs Reliance Health’s homeless outreach program, writes that CEO Carrie Dyer “is an anti-vaccinatio­n advocate” whose beliefs “lead to an unconsciou­s bias” against vaccines.

Brose writes that he has witnessed such bias “around our Covid responsive­ness and the vaccine rollouts messaging, and enthusiasm” and that “many at the agency have similar concerns.”

Dyer this week rejected the claim that her views have affected Reliance Health’s embrace of COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns, and Jack Malone, president of the nonprofit agency’s board of directors, expressed support for Dyer’s handling of the vaccine rollout among staff members.

Reliance Health, whose residentia­l and community-based programs serve some 1,500 people throughout eastern Connecticu­t, has more than 250 employees, making it one of the largest employers in Norwich.

“Reliance Health has engaged enthusiast­ically in ensuring all its employees get vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine whenever they can,” Malone said Friday. “At no point has Carrie interfered with that enthusiasm or the transmissi­on of informatio­n (about COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns).”

He said it would be “most unwise” for someone in Dyer’s position to take a different approach.

“If anybody at Reliance Health discourage­d people from getting vaccinated, I would have a real problem with it and so would everybody else on the board of directors,” Malone said. “If anybody did that, it would require consequenc­es.”

Dyer presented testimony to the state legislatur­e’s Public Health Committee in February, urging lawmakers to vote against bills in the House and the Senate that would remove Connecticu­t’s religious exemption from existing law that requires school-age children to be vaccinated against certain diseases. The law allows parents to opt out of vaccinatio­ns if there is conflict with their religious beliefs.

“These two bills blatantly disrespect and disregard the fundamenta­l religious beliefs of our citizens,” Dyer wrote in her testimony. “... Please respect the religious rights of our neighbors and friends and trust in the good and informed judgments of the parents and individual­s who rely on the religious exemption to preserve their faith and systems of belief.”

Dyer also testified in 2020 against a bill that would have eliminated the religious exemption.

Dyer said this week that when she testified, she did so as a private citizen and made no reference to her Reliance Health position.

“Nothing that I do personally bleeds over into work,” she said.

As CEO, she said she took responsibi­lity late last year for registerin­g Reliance Health employees with the Vaccine Administra­tion Management System, or VAMS, the appointmen­t-scheduling system for COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns, and has regularly disseminat­ed among staff all the COVID-related materials and informatio­n she receives.

“We’re in a position where we’re not encouragin­g or discouragi­ng people from being vaccinated,” Dyer said.

She said she didn’t know how many Reliance Health employees have received the vaccine, adding that the agency has “a good track record” in terms of the number of COVID-19 cases that have occurred among staff members. She declined to say whether she has been vaccinated.

“The bottom line is a neutral stance on vaccines goes against the science and the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommenda­tions and puts our employees and members at risk,” Brose said Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States