The Day

Justices rule religious schools must get aid

- By MARK SHERMAN

Washington — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Maine can’t exclude religious schools from a program that offers tuition aid for private education, a decision that could ease religious organizati­ons’ access to taxpayer money.

The 6-3 outcome could fuel a renewed push for school choice programs in some of the 18 states that have so far not directed taxpayer money to private, religious education. The most immediate effect of the court’s ruling beyond Maine probably will be felt next door in Vermont, which has a similar program.

The decision is the latest in a line of rulings from the Supreme Court that have favored religion-based discrimina­tion claims. The court is separately weighing the case of a football coach who says he has a First Amendment right to pray at midfield immediatel­y after games.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for a conservati­ve majority that the Maine program violates the Constituti­on’s protection­s for religious freedoms.

“Maine’s ‘nonsectari­an’ requiremen­t for its otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Regardless of how the benefit and restrictio­n are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise,” Roberts wrote.

The court’s three liberal justices dissented. “This Court continues to dismantle the wall of separation between church and state that the Framers fought to build,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote.

Justice Stephen Breyer noted in a separate dissent that Maine “wishes to provide children within the State with a secular, public education. This wish embodies, in significan­t part, the constituti­onal need to avoid spending public money to support what is essentiall­y the teaching and practice of religion.”

But Roberts wrote that states are not obligated to subsidize private education. Once they do, however, they can’t cut out religious schools, he wrote, echoing his opinion in a similar case from two years ago.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States