The Day

Groton schools could lose 125 staff positions

Cuts may come despite proposed 7.91% increase in education budget

- By KIMBERLY DRELICH Day Staff Writer

Groton — About a dozen speakers at a public hearing Wednesday commented on a proposed education budget that despite calling for a 7.91% increase would eliminate the equivalent of 125 positions funded by expiring federal COVID-19 relief funds.

The full- and part-time positions include tutors, as well as substitute­s, aides, teachers, security guards, coordinato­rs, clerical positions, social workers and a custodian/maintenanc­e position, according to Superinten­dent of Schools Susan Austin.

Resident Vince Yevoli, one of the speakers at the hearing on Groton’s overall budget, said Groton’s education spending has lagged behind other districts in the area. He implored the town to support the budget and try to find other funds to cover the shortfall of educators.

Resident Vanessa Ghantous, whose three children benefited from Groton’s educationa­l programs, called for the town to prioritize education.

“We’re not just educating children,” Ghantous said. “We are educating our future leaders.”

James Mitchell, a resident and former superinten­dent, called attention to COVID-19’s impact on the community and supported restoring the staffing.

“Our students are suffering,” Mitchell said.

During the hearing, Town Manager John Burt presented the $158.15 million proposed fiscal year 2025 budget, an increase of 6.2% over the current budget. The proposal, which uses about $4 million in fund balance, would raise the tax rate from 22.13 to 24.07 mills.

Burt said the budget includes a 3.5% increase for town operations, a 7.91% increase for education, a 1.4% increase for capital/debt services, a 2.2% increase for outside agencies and a 15% increase for subdivisio­ns.

Under the budget proposal, homeowners with a home assessed at $100,000 would see an annual tax increase of $194; homeowners with a home assessed at $200,000 would see an increase of $388; homeowners with a house assessed at $300,000 would see an increase of $582; and homeowners with a house assessed at $400,00 would see an increase of $776, according to Burt’s presentati­on.

Of the overall budget, $87.96 million is for education. Austin said the budget drivers for the proposed education budget include increases in contractua­l salaries, the minimum wage, transporta­tion, insurance and utilities, and uncertaint­y over a Department of Defense supplement­al grant used to cover technology.

Federal coronaviru­s relief funds will expire at the end of this fiscal year.

Adrian Johnson, a Board of Education member who was speaking as a resident, said during the hearing:

“It’s not lost on me that the education budget looks like an increase for our schools, but the truth is that the budget will be a substantia­l cut to instructio­n and services for our children.”

Johnson, who had a slightly higher count of eliminated positions than the superinten­dent based on his belief that there are positions, in addition to those funded by coronaviru­s relief money, that would be eliminated, said the majority of the staff positions are people who work with children on a daily basis.

Johnson called instead for the 9.3% increase in the education budget that the Board of Education had discussed.

Austin said by phone Thursday that the budget still has to go through the entire process, and no one who may be impacted can be identified. She said no paraeducat­or positions would be eliminated.

“We just have to wait and see what the final answer is going to be from the community,” she said.

Elizabeth A. Williams, a special education tutor at Robert E. Fitch High School and a union representa­tive for the paraeducat­ors’ union, said by phone Thursday that a meeting is scheduled for April 15 between union leadership and the administra­tion. She said the positions proposed to be eliminated are people who work directly with students.

“It’s really going to affect the children of our district,” she said.

At Wednesday’s hearing, speakers also advocated for open space, parks and recreation and the Groton Public Library.

With the cost of basic necessitie­s going up, resident Annette Lapkowski asked town officials to “think thrifty” when tackling the budget.

“Pushing more costs onto taxpayers only adds more uncertaint­y in these trying financial times,” Lapkowski said.

Lian Obrey, a Representa­tive Town Meeting member, spoke about encouragin­g economic developmen­t to increase revenue. She said Groton is far behind the growth other towns in the region are seeing, especially in housing.

Burt said the Town Council is beginning its budget reviews and must approve a budget by April 28. The RTM must make a decision by May 25, and the council must set the tax rate by June 9.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States