The Denver Post

“Pesticide-free” pot in lieu of “organic”

- By David Migoya and Ricardo Baca David Migoya: 303-954-1506, dmigoya@denverpost.com or @davidmigoy­a

Consumers would know whether marijuana or hemp was grown without the use of pesticides under a bill proposed Wednesday in the legislatur­e.

HB16-1079 would require the state Department of Agricultur­e to devise a program in which independen­t companies would certify which cannabis is pesticide-free, and it would require special labeling consumers can see.

Marijuana growers are forestalle­d from using the term “organic” for their product even if they use certifiabl­e organic practices. That’s because use of the term and the certificat­ion necessary to acquire it is controlled by the U.S. Department of Agricultur­e. Because cannabis remains illegal under federal law, no marijuana or hemp can be designated legally as organic.

“I’m all for a certificat­ion that ensures to consumers that the final product they’ve purchased truly is pesticide-free,” said Devin Liles, head of cultivatio­n at The Farm in Boulder.

The issue, however, is confusing organic with pesticide-free, Liles said.

“As (the bill) is written, it runs the risk of perpetuati­ng the common misconcept­ion that organic is synonymous with pesticidef­ree,” he said. “There are organic pesticides that are comprised of essential oils that are perfectly safe to use, not necessaril­y in (marijuana) flower developmen­t.”

The bill, introduced by Rep. Jonathan Singer, DLongmont, and Rep. KC Becker, D-Boulder, would extend to pesticide-free facilities where cannabis is processed.

The Denver Post in September reported that state Attorney General Cynthia Hoffman’s office was investigat­ing marijuana business owners using the word “organic” in their name or advertisin­g.

The concern was that consumers might be misled. No details of the ongoing inquiry have been released.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States