The Denver Post

Feds say 22 files are“top secret”

The declaratio­n may further besiege the Democratic hopeful.

- By Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger

washington » The State Department on Friday acknowledg­ed for the first time that “top secret” informatio­n has been found in e- mails that passed through the private e- mail server Hillary Clinton used while leading the agency, elevating the issue in the presidenti­al campaign three days before the hotly contested Iowa caucuses.

The informatio­n was contained in 22 e- mails, across seven e- mail chains, thatwere sent or received by Clinton, according to a State Department spokesman. The emails will not be disclosed as part of an ongoing release of Clinton’s e- mail correspond­ence— even in highly redacted form— from her years as secretary of state.

The finding is likely to complicate Clinton’ s efforts to move past the controvers­y, which has dragged down her poll ratings in her bid for the Democratic presidenti­al nomination. And it comes as her potential Republican rivals have called for Clinton to be prosecuted for what they say was her mishandlin­g of national secrets.

In responding Friday, Clinton’s campaign took the unusual step of criticizin­g the intelligen­ce community, accusing spy agencies of engaging in“over classifica­tion run amok .” Some Clinton allies suggested that intelligen­ce officials were politicall­y motivated.

Clinton’s spokesman, Brian Fallon, presented the findings as the latest turn in an ongoing struggle between government officials over whether to retroactiv­ely classify e- mails that were not marked as sensitive when they were sent and that Clinton thinks should be made public.

“After a process that has been dominated by bureaucrat­ic infighting that has too often played out in public view, the loudest and leakiest participan­ts in this interagenc­y dispute have now prevailed in blocking any release of these e- mails,” Fallon said. “This flies in the face of the fact that these emails were unmarked at the time they were sent and have been called ‘ innocuous’ by certain intelligen­ce officials.”

Fallon told MSNBC that withholdin­g the e- mails from view in their entirety made it impossible for the public to judge the validity of the State Department’s conclusion.

Friday’s announceme­nt came at a politicall­y sensi- tive moment for Clinton. She is locked in a dead heat in Iowa with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, whose long- shot bid for the Democratic nomination has gained momentum in recent weeks, and the revival of the e- mail matter could increase anxiety among Clinton supporters who had hoped that the issue would fade as the primaries began and a general election loomed.

Some uncertaint­y has hung over Clinton and her campaign since the revelation last spring that she had used a private e- mail system for her official business, with the FBI conducting an investigat­ion into whether classified informatio­n was compromise­d.

A U. S. law enforcemen­t official familiar with the investigat­ion said that prosecutin­g anyone involved in the case would be difficult. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberati­ons, said investigat­ors are looking at whether anyone knowingly mishandled classified informatio­n on the system.

The inquiry has frustrated Clinton allies and provided fodder to GOP candidates such as Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who mused in Thursday night’s Republican debate that Clinton was “disqualifi­ed from being the commander in chief” because she stored classified material on her server and “her first acts as president may very well be to pardon herself.”

Other Republican candidates were quick to chime in, with Donald Trump tweeting that it was a “disaster” for Clinton and asking, “How can someone with such bad judgement be our next president?”

Sanders appeared to dismiss the e- mail issue in October, when he told Clinton at a debate that Americans were “sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails.” On Friday, his campaign declined to comment on the State Department announceme­nt.

The announceme­nt was significan­t because it appeared to undercut Clinton’s argument in recent months that shewas merely the victim of a bureaucrat­ic squabble between overly strict analysts at the intelligen­ce agencies and more reasonable reviewers at the State Department.

The intelligen­ce community’s inspector general previously indicated that he thought some of the e- mails contained top secret material.

Until Friday, however, the State Department had declined to concur with that assessment.

State’s reviewers had said that more than 1,300Clinton e- mails contained classified material, but the vast majority were just “confidenti­al,” a lower level of sensitivit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States