The Denver Post

Israeli cabinet reneges on gender pledge

Move nixes plan for mixed services held at Western Wall

- By Ruth Eglash and William Booth

jerusalem» Israel’s government on Sunday nixed an ambitious plan approved last year to allow mixed-gender religious services at the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest prayer site, angering many American Jews, who said they felt insulted and abandoned by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition.

Israel’s holy Jewish sites are managed by ultra-Orthodox Jews, and in keeping with their traditions, the Western Wall plaza is divided according to gender. Women are not permitted to read aloud from the Torah, wear prayer shawls or sing there.

Non-Orthodox streams of Judaism, including the Reform and Conservati­ve denominati­ons that are prevalent in the United States, allow men and women to pray side by side, and female rabbis regularly lead services.

Reform and Conservati­ve Jewish leaders in the United States and Israel have long pressed for an area of the Western Wall where fathers can stand beside daughters and mothers beside sons for prayer and religious services.

A 2016 plan approved by the government to provide such an area was described as a “fair and creative solution” by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“It’s a place that is supposed to unite the Jewish people,” he said at the time.

According to a study by the Pew Research Center published in March 2016, more than half of American Jews identify themselves as either Reform or Conservati­ve, while only about 10 percent observe Orthodox practices. In Israel, only a small minority are affiliated with those movements.

Sunday’s decision to cancel the new Western Wall arrangemen­t has drawn denunciati­ons from liberal Jews in Israel and the United States.

It also appeared to threaten Netanyahu’s fragile coalition, with Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman - head of a faction that represents secular Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union — vowing to fight back.

“It actually causes terrible harm to Jewish unity and to the alliance between the State of Israel and Diaspora Jewry,” Israeli media quoted him as saying.

Writing in the Jerusalem Post, editor in chief Yaakov Katz commented: “Sunday will go down in history as a shameful day for the State of Israel and as another nail in the coffin of Israel’s failing relationsh­ip with Diaspora Jewry.”

“Netanyahu’s office made sure to issue a statement that the cabinet decision on Sunday was not to cancel the deal but was merely to freeze it. This is a sham,” Katz wrote. “The deal had already been frozen for the last 18 months and wasn’t moving forward. By taking this decision today, Netanyahu is simply signaling to Diaspora Jewry that at the end of the day his political survival is more important than Israeli-Diaspora relations.”

The prime minister said in a statement that he would seek an alternativ­e solution, appointing senior minister Tzachi Hanegbi to look into it.

“The prime minister’s decision came from the realizatio­n that over the last year and a half nothing has progressed with this plan, so another solution needs to be found,” Hanegbi said.

“We are not going to quietly accept this. It is so insulting, I know there will be a series of responses,” said Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union of Reform Judaism, which represents 1.5 million Reform Jews in 900 synagogues in the United States and Canada.

The decision “delegitimi­zes the overwhelmi­ng majority of Jews on the planet,” Jacobs said.

Natan Sharansky, the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel who formulated the original plan, said he was deeply disappoint­ed. “Five years ago, the prime minister asked me to bring all the sides together to create a solution where there would be one wall for one people,” he said.

Anat Hoffman, chair of Women of the Wall, a feminist group that has been pushing for a solution at the site, described Netanyahu’s decision as “shameful.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States