The Denver Post

CNN accepts resignatio­ns of three in retracted story

Network apologizes for story about Wall Street executive.

- By Erik Wemple The Washington Post

Thomas Frank, a reporter for “CNN Investigat­es,” last Thursday appeared to have a compelling exclusive on the story of the year. The Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, reported Frank, was investigat­ing a Russian investment fund — the Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) — “whose chief executive met with a member of President Donald Trump’s transition team four days before Trump’s inaugurati­on.”

That transition team official is Anthony Scaramucci, a Wall Streeter who was expected to take a prominent White House position but did not. Scaramucci met in January with RDIF head Kirill Dmitriev.

The CNN exclusive — which hung from one unnamed source — didn’t take long to wither. Breitbart News’ Matthew Boyle bombed the CNN piece as baseless. Sputnik News published a refutation, indicating that the fund was not a part of Russian state bank Vneshecono­mbank, as the CNN report had claimed. This detail mattered a great deal, considerin­g that Vneshecono­mbank was listed in a set of sanctions issued by the U.S. government. According to the CNN report, the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee’s probe into this matter was linked to the meeting between top Trump adviser/son-in-law Jared Kushner and Vneshecono­mbank CEO Sergey Gorkov during the presidenti­al transition.

Scaramucci himself chimed in, tweeting:

“It’s ok. I did nothing wrong. They like hitting friends of @potus who are loyal advocates on his behalf.”

CNN issued a retraction late on Friday.

An appreciati­ve Scaramucci tweeted:

“@CNN did the right thing. Classy move. Apology accepted. Everyone makes mistakes. Moving on.”

Now for the consequenc­es. CNN announced on Monday afternoon that three network officials are leaving their jobs over the incident: Frank, the reporter on the story; Eric Lichtblau, a recent CNN addition from the New York Times who edited the piece; and Lex Haris, the executive editor of “CNN Investigat­es.” The moves follow an investigat­ion carried out by CNN executives over the weekend, with the conclusion that longstandi­ng network procedures for publishing stories weren’t properly followed. “There was a significan­t breakdown in process,” says a CNN source. “There were editorial checks and balances within the organizati­on that weren’t met.”

The official CNN statement: “In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignatio­ns of the employees involved in the story’s publicatio­n.”

Regarding the personnel changes, a CNN source said, “The individual­s all stated that they accepted responsibi­lity and wanted to resign.” A compelling wrinkle in the saga of the story springs from the careful language in the editor’s note: “That story did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted. Links to the story have been disabled. CNN apologizes to Mr. Scaramucci,” it reads.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States