Schumer says fir­ing Mueller would be GOP tip­ping point

The Denver Post - - NEWS - By Mark Ni­quette — The As­so­ci­ated Press

Se­nate Demo­cratic leader Chuck Schumer said Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump would trig­ger “a cat­a­clysm” if he fires Spe­cial Coun­sel Robert Mueller or par­dons him­self, even as one of the pres­i­dent’s lawyers said par­dons aren’t be­ing dis­cussed.

Schumer said he can’t imag­ine his Repub­li­can col­leagues, in­clud­ing Se­nate Ma­jor­ity Leader Mitch McCon­nell and House Speaker Paul Ryan, “just stand­ing by” if Trump moves to dis­miss Mueller or par­dons him­self or some­one close to him who is un­der in­ves­ti­ga­tion.

“It would be one of the great­est, great­est break­ing of rule of law, of tra­di­tional demo­cratic norms of what our democ­racy is about,” Schumer said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sun­day. “It would cause a cat­a­clysm in Washington.”

Whereas the pres­i­dent has the con­sti­tu­tional power to grant par­dons — although the U.S. Supreme Court prob­a­bly would have to de­cide whether he could par­don him­self — his le­gal team isn’t hav­ing con­ver­sa­tions with him about it, Jay Seku­low, one of Trump’s per­sonal at­tor­neys, said on ABC.

“We’re not re­search­ing the is­sue be­cause the is­sue of par­dons is not on the ta­ble,” Seku­low said. “There’s noth­ing to par­don from.”

The pres­i­dent and mem­bers of his in­ner cir­cle are fac­ing con­gres­sional and FBI in­ves­ti­ga­tions of pos­si­ble col­lu­sion with Rus­sia in its in­ter­fer­ence with the 2016 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion. Mueller is also ex­am­in­ing a broad range of trans­ac­tions in­volv­ing Trump’s busi­nesses as well as those of his as­so­ciates, a per­son fa­mil­iar with the probe said.

Trump sug­gested in an in­ter­view with the New York Times on July 19 that Mueller would cross “a red line” if he looked into those is­sues, and the pres­i­dent men­tioned par­dons as part of a se­ries of early-morn­ing Twit­ter posts on Satur­day.

“While all agree the U.S. Pres­i­dent has the com­plete power to par­don, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us,” Trump told his 34.3 mil­lion fol­low­ers on Twit­ter.

An­thony Scara­mucci, whom Trump named his new com­mu­ni­ca­tions direc­tor Fri­day, called the fo­cus on Rus­sia “overblown.” He said on “Fox News Sun­day” that the pres­i­dent brought up the is­sue of par­dons in the Oval Of­fice last week and said that he doesn’t need to use it.

“There’s no­body around him that has to be par­doned,” Scara­mucci said. “He was just mak­ing the state­ment about the power of par­dons.”

Trump “in all like­li­hood” has the power to par­don him­self, but it’s not a good idea, Repub­li­can Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “In a po­lit­i­cal sphere, I would cau­tion some­one to think about par­don­ing them­selves or fam­ily mem­bers,” Paul said.

Trump also has sug­gested on Twit­ter that Mueller and mem­bers of his le­gal team have con­flicts of in­ter­est be­cause of do­na­tions to Demo­cratic po­lit­i­cal can­di­dates — some­thing Scara­mucci, daugh­ter Ivanka Trump and the pres­i­dent him­self have done in the past.

Seku­low said that although Trump’s le­gal team is mon­i­tor­ing po­ten­tial con­flicts, it hasn’t raised any with Rod Rosen­stein, the deputy at­tor­ney gen­eral who ap­pointed Mueller af­ter At­tor­ney Gen­eral Jeff Ses­sions re­cused him­self from the Rus­sia in­ves­ti­ga­tion.

“We’re go­ing to be con­stantly eval­u­at­ing that sit­u­a­tion,” Seku­low said on ABC.

Trump tweets frus­tra­tion with Repub­li­cans •

WASHINGTON»

Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump is ex­press­ing his frus­tra­tion with Repub­li­cans, say­ing they “do very lit­tle to pro­tect their Pres­i­dent.”

In a tweet Sun­day, Trump says this hap­pens even with “some that were car­ried over the line on my back.”

The pres­i­dent didn’t make it clear ex­actly why he’s up­set. “And if an in­ves­ti­ga­tion were to arise and we thought that the con­flict was rel­e­vant, we would raise it with­out ques­tion.”

Only Rosen­stein can fire Mueller, and he’s said he won’t do it with­out “good cause.” So Trump would first have to purge the up­per ranks of the Jus­tice Depart­ment un­til he finds some­one will­ing to fol­low his or­ders and dis­miss the spe­cial coun­sel.

“I would strongly ad­vise him not to,” Schumer said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.