The Denver Post

Facebook says it sold political ads to Russians

Acknowledg­ment could raise more questions as special counsel continues his probe

- By Carol D. Leonnig, Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman

Representa­tives of Facebook told congressio­nal investigat­ors Wednesday that it has discovered it sold ads during the U.S. presidenti­al election to a shadowy Russian company seeking to target voters, according to several people familiar with the company’s findings.

Facebook officials reported that they traced the ad sales, totaling $100,000, to a Russian “troll farm” with a history of pushing pro-Kremlin propaganda, these people said.

A small portion of the ads, which began in the summer of 2015, directly named Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, the people said, though they declined to say which candidate the ads favored.

Most of the ads, according to a blog post published late Wednesday by Facebook’s chief security officer, Alex Stamos, “appeared to focus on amplifying divisive social and political messages across the ideologica­l spectrum — touching on topics from LGBT matters to race issues to immigratio­n to gun rights.”

The acknowledg­ment by Facebook comes as congressio­nal investigat­ors and special counsel Robert Mueller are probing Russian interferen­ce in the U.S. election, including allegation­s that the Kremlin may have coordinate­d with the Trump campaign.

The U.S. intelligen­ce community concluded in January that Russia had interfered in the U.S. election to help elect Trump, including by using paid social media trolls to spread fake news intended to influence public opinion.

Even though the ad spending from Russia is tiny relative to overall campaign costs, the report from Facebook that a Russian firm was able to target political messages is likely to fuel pointed questions from investigat­ors about whether the Russians received guidance from people in the United States — a question some Democrats have been asking for months.

Facebook reported in its blog post Wednesday that about one-quarter of the ads in question were “geographic­ally targeted,” though company officials declined

to provide specifics about what areas or demographi­c groups were the recipients. Of those targeted ads, the company said, more ran in 2015 than 2016.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the senior Democrat on the House Intelligen­ce Committee, said Wednesday that the disclosure by Facebook confirmed one of the ways Russia sought to interfere in U.S. politics and serves as a “profound warning to us and others about future elections.”

“This is a very significan­t set of data points produced by Facebook,” Schiff said, adding: “Left unanswered in what we received from Facebook — because it is beyond the scope of what they are able to determine — is whether there was any coordinati­on between these social media trolls and the campaign. We have to get to the bottom of that.”

The House panel, whose staff investigat­ors heard briefly from Facebook representa­tives behind closed doors Wednesday, will fol- low up with Facebook and other social media companies and platforms to see “to what degree they are able to confirm similar metrics,” Schiff said.

An official familiar with Facebook’s internal investigat­ion said the company does not have the ability to determine whether the ads it sold represente­d any sort of coordinati­on.

The acknowledg­ment by Facebook follows months of criticism that the social media company served as a platform for the spread of false informatio­n before the November election. In December, the company announced that it would begin flagging articles that had been deemed false or fake, with the assistance of factchecki­ng organizati­ons.

Facebook discovered the Russian connection as part of an investigat­ion that began this spring looking at purchasers of politicall­ymotivated ads, according to people familiar with the inquiry. It found 3,300 ads had digital footprints that led to the Russian company.

Facebook teams then discovered 470 suspicious and likely fraudulent Facebook accounts and pages that it believes operated out of Russia, had links to the company and were involved in promoting the ads.

A Facebook official said “there is evidence that some of the accounts are linked to a troll farm in St. Petersburg, referred to as the Internet Research Agency, though we have no way to independen­tly confirm.” The official declined to release any of the ads it traced to Russian companies or entities.

“Our data policy and federal law limit our ability to share user data and content, so we won’t be releasing any ads,” the official said. The official added that the ads “were directed at people on Facebook who had expressed interest in subjects explored on those pages, such as LGBT community, black social issues, the Second Amendment and immigratio­n.”

Earlier this year, Facebook announced technology improvemen­ts to detect fake accounts and more recently announced it would no longer allow Facebook pages to advertise if they have a pattern of sharing false news stories. Over the past few months, Stamos said, the company also has taken action to block fake accounts tied to election meddling in France and Germany.

The Internet Research Agency has received attention in the past.

In 2013, hackers released internal company documents showing it employed 600 people across Russia. Ex-employees who have gone public with their experience­s at the company have said their work entailed creating fake Twitter and Facebook accounts and using them to circulate proKremlin propaganda. They said Internet Research Agency employees, for instance, spread derogatory informatio­n about Putin critic Boris Nemtsov in the days after his 2015 murder.

In 2015, the New York Times Magazine reported that social media accounts linked to the Internet Research Agency had launched social media campaigns in the United States, including a sophistica­ted hoax that spread false news of a chemical leak in Louisiana in 2014, apparently to sow chaos and fear.

In its unclassifi­ed report in January, the U.S. intelligen­ce community concluded that the Internet Research Agency’s “likely financier” is a “close Putin ally with ties to Russian intelligen­ce.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States